PlanningTrack
Get started

Council planning record

RETIREMENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING 71 FLATS, WARDEN'S ACCOMMODATION, COMMUNAL FACILITIES AND CAR PARKING.

Land at High Street and, Cherry Orchard, Pershore, WR10

RefusalReference: W/05/00773/PNWychavon District Council

Last published check: 25 Oct 2026, 18:17. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Application Received Date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

  2. Application Valid Date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

  3. Consultation Start Date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

  4. Consultation End

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source

  5. Decision Date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

  6. Committee Date (if applicable)

    Published milestoneCouncil source

Application summary

Status
Refusal
Application type
Full planning permission
Received
27 Apr 2005
Validated
24 May 2005
Determination deadline
Not published
Local authority
Wychavon District Council

Application overview

RETIREMENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING 71 FLATS, WARDEN'S ACCOMMODATION, COMMUNAL FACILITIES AND CAR PARKING.

Proposal details

Reference
W/05/00773/PN
Ward
Pershore Ward - Pre 01/05/23
Parish
Pershore

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Application location

Land at High Street and, Cherry Orchard, Pershore, WR10

This record has no verified map location.

Documents 56 of 56

DocumentPublishedAction
85649.pdf01. Application Form9 Jun 2005View
NEIGHBOUR NOTIFICATION01. Application Form21 Jun 2005View
DESIGN STATEMENT02. Supporting Information9 Jun 2005View
REFUSED04. Site/Location Plan9 Jun 2005View
REFUSED04. Site/Location Plan9 Jun 2005View
REFUSED04. Site/Location Plan9 Jun 2005View
REFUSED04. Site/Location Plan9 Jun 2005View
REFUSED04. Site/Location Plan9 Jun 2005View
REFUSED04. Site/Location Plan9 Jun 2005View
REFUSED04. Site/Location Plan9 Jun 2005View
HARTNELL & TAYLORCOOK08. Response - Neighbour and Other9 Jun 2005View
BARRIS LIPTROTT08. Response - Neighbour and Other16 Jun 2005View
MARK COX ENVIRONMENTAL08. Response - Neighbour and Other16 Jun 2005View
COMMITTEE REFERRAL08. Response - Neighbour and Other1 Jul 2005View
MIKE STEPHENSON08. Response - Neighbour and Other15 Jul 2005View
B LIPTROTT08. Response - Neighbour and Other15 Jul 2005View
B LIPTROTT08. Response - Neighbour and Other15 Jul 2005View
SPRING ELECTRONICS08. Response - Neighbour and Other18 Aug 2005View
TO MR ALEXANDER08. Response - Neighbour and Other29 Dec 2005View
ANDREW FUSZARD08. Response - Neighbour and Other6 Apr 2006View
MARK COX09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Jun 2005View
MARK COX09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Jun 2005View
ENGLISH HERITAGE09. Response - Statutory Consultee24 Jun 2005View
FRANCES EVANS09. Response - Statutory Consultee24 Jun 2005View
A LAWSON09. Response - Statutory Consultee24 Jun 2005View
A LAWSON09. Response - Statutory Consultee24 Jun 2005View
A ATHERTON09. Response - Statutory Consultee24 Jun 2005View
MR & MRS GREEN09. Response - Statutory Consultee24 Jun 2005View
A ATHERTON09. Response - Statutory Consultee24 Jun 2005View
MR & MRS PERRI09. Response - Statutory Consultee1 Jul 2005View
L GOLDRING & B WOODWARD09. Response - Statutory Consultee1 Jul 2005View
MRS WINKETT09. Response - Statutory Consultee1 Jul 2005View
HIGHWAYS09. Response - Statutory Consultee1 Jul 2005View
ENVIRONMENTAL09. Response - Statutory Consultee6 Jul 2005View
JOHN MIDDLETON09. Response - Statutory Consultee6 Jul 2005View
B MIDDLETON09. Response - Statutory Consultee6 Jul 2005View
PERSHORE CIVIC SOCIETY09. Response - Statutory Consultee6 Jul 2005View
S GRIFFITHS09. Response - Statutory Consultee8 Jul 2005View
CONSERVATION09. Response - Statutory Consultee8 Jul 2005View
HIGHWAYS09. Response - Statutory Consultee12 Aug 2005View
TOWN COUNCIL09. Response - Statutory Consultee30 Aug 2005View
ENGINEERS09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Sept 2006View
WCC09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Sept 2006View
MR &MRS GREEN09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Sept 2006View
POLICY09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Sept 2006View
HOUSING NEEDS09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Sept 2006View
L GOLDRING & B WOODWARD09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Sept 2006View
MIKE STEPHENSON09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Sept 2006View
DENISE DUGGAN09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Sept 2006View
DENISE DUGGAN09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Sept 2006View
JULIAN YEO09. Response - Statutory Consultee21 Sept 2006View
91481.pdf10. Committee Documents28 Jul 2005View
UPDATE10. Committee Documents9 Aug 2005View
DELEGATED DECISION11. Decision Information2 Sept 2005View
SITE INSPECTION NOTES11. Decision Information2 Sept 2005View
95157.pdf12. Decision Notice2 Sept 2005View

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Decision & conditions

Refusal
DELEGATED DECISION SITE INSPECTION NOTES 95157.pdf
Planning conditions

Conditions aren’t listed here. Read the council decision notice for the full decision and conditions.

Related records

No related records were published in this section.

Understand this planning record

All planning guides

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

    UK research
    Published Updated

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

    UK research
    Published Updated

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.

    UK research
    Published Updated