Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
The erection of a single storey rear extension, which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 6m, with a maximum height of 3m, and an eaves height of 3m
Proposal details
- Reference
- Y/20517/002
- Alternative references
- PP-15144321
- Ward
- Cippenham Manor
- Agent
- Janjua
- UPRN
- 100080330790
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 7 of 7
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Application Form - Without Personal DataSubmitted Plans/Documents | 25 Aug 2026 | View |
| Location PlanSubmitted Plans/Documents | 25 Aug 2026 | View |
| Block PlanSubmitted Plans/Documents | 25 Aug 2026 | View |
| Existing and Proposed ElevationsSubmitted Plans/Documents | 25 Aug 2026 | View |
| Existing and Proposed Ground Floor PlansSubmitted Plans/Documents | 25 Aug 2026 | View |
| Decision NoticeDecisions | 24 Sept 2026 | View |
| Officers ReportDecisions | 24 Sept 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Decision Notice Officers ReportPlanning conditions
- The proposed single storey rear extension by reason of its height, depth and siting close to the neighbour boundary with no. 83 Paxton Avenue would result in an overbearing impact and and sense of enclosure within the neighbouring rear garden. This harm is considered to be a significant adverse impact on the amenity of adjoining occupiers and therefore the proposal would fail to comply with Policies EN1, EN2, and H15 of The Adopted Local Plan for Slough 2004 and Core Policy 8 of The Core Strategy 2006 - 2026, the Slough Local Development Framework, Residential Extensions Guidelines, Supplementary Planning Document, Adopted January 2010.
