Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
The erection of a single storey rear extension, which would extend beyond the rear wall of the original house by 5.00m, with a maximum height of 3.00m, and an eaves height of 2.75m
Proposal details
- Reference
- Y/01067/002
- Ward
- Cippenham Green
- Agent
- Janjua
- UPRN
- AP3RG4845H047WWGWD
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 8 of 8
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Existing & Proposed Floor Plans & Block PlanSubmitted Plans and Details | 8 Jan 2026 | View |
| Existing ElevationsSubmitted Plans and Details | 8 Jan 2026 | View |
| Proposed ElevationsSubmitted Plans and Details | 8 Jan 2026 | View |
| Site Location PlanSubmitted Plans and Details | 8 Jan 2026 | View |
| Application Form - RedactedApplication Form | 12 Jan 2026 | View |
| Revised PlansAmended Plans | 6 Feb 2026 | View |
| Decision NoticeDecisions | 19 Feb 2026 | View |
| Officers ReportDecisions | 19 Feb 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Decision Notice Officers ReportPlanning conditions
- The application has failed to demonstrate the proposal would not have a significant impact on the residential amenities at No 44 Cippenham Lane in terms of overbearing and in terms of loss of privacy at No 46 Cippenham Lane. The proposal therefore does not comply with Policy EN1 and EN2 and H15 of The Adopted Local Plan, Core Policy 8 of The Core Strategy and the National Planning Policy Framework.
