Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Construction of a two storey side and rear extension to existing dwelling, plus internal alterations.
Proposal details
- Reference
- P/20983/000
- Alternative references
- PP-14645383
- Ward
- Langley Foxborough
- Agent
- Mr Ray Fletcher
- UPRN
- 100080320366
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 6 of 6
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Mixed/Combined PlansSubmitted Plans and Details | 23 Jan 2026 | View |
| Mixed/Combined PlansSubmitted Plans and Details | 23 Jan 2026 | View |
| The location planSubmitted Plans and Details | 23 Jan 2026 | View |
| Application Form - Without Personal DataApplication Form | 23 Jan 2026 | View |
| Signed Decision NoticeDecisions | 19 Mar 2026 | View |
| Signed Officer ReportDecisions | 19 Mar 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Decision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceConsultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Signed Decision Notice Signed Officer ReportPlanning conditions
- The proposed two-storey side/rear extension, by virtue of its depth, width, height, massing and bulk, would fail to appear as a subservient addition to the host dwelling and, in particular, the excessive depth would appear out of character in the streetscene. Furthermore, the juxtaposition of the roof form where it meets the existing rear projection would appear incongruous and contrived in visual terms. The proposals are therefore contrary to DP3 and EX26-EX31 (inclusive) of the Residential Extensions Guidelines SPD (2010), Saved Policies EN1, EN2 and H15 of the Slough Local Plan (2004), Core Policy 8 of the Slough Core Strategy (2008) and Paragraphs 131 and 135 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024).
- It is the view of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed development does not improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area for the reasons given in this notice and it is not in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework.
- Drawings considered: - OS Location Plan, dated 22/01/2026, received 23/01/2026 - rpf1446sht1a, dated 21/01/2026, received 23/01/2026 - rpf1446sht2a, dated 21/01/2026, received 23/01/2026
- The proposals, by virtue of the proposed positioning, depth, height, massing, bulk and position of openings, would result in undue impacts to the outlook of the first-floor rear window of No.50 High Street, as well as reducing their levels of sunlight and daylight, and would also result in undue overlooking of No.58 High Street to the north. In the absence of sufficient information, including a Daylight/Sunlight Assessment, the LPA cannot be certain that the proposals would not reduce the amenity of neighbouring properties to levels below that which they could reasonably expect to enjoy. The proposals are therefore contrary to DP6-DP8 (inclusive) and EX30 of the Residential Extensions Guidelines SPD (2010), Saved Policies EN1, EN2 and H15 of the Slough Local Plan (2004), Core Policy 8 of the Core Strategy (2008) and Paragraph 135 f) of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024).
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
