Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Construction of a two storey side, single storey rear and part first floor rear extension
Proposal details
- Reference
- P/20950/002
- Alternative references
- PP-14460358
- Ward
- Langley Foxborough
- Agent
- Nagpal
- UPRN
- AP10G78A59X46TWG90
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 2 of 2
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Signed_Decision_Notice.pdfDecisions | 20 Jan 2026 | View |
| Signed_Officer_Report.pdfDecisions | 20 Jan 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Decision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceConsultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Signed_Decision_Notice.pdf Signed_Officer_Report.pdfPlanning conditions
- The proposed extensions, by virtue of their positioning, height, width, depth, massing and bulk, individually and when considered in conjunction with the ‘permitted development’ schemes applied for, would fail to appear visually subordinate to the host dwelling and would instead overwhelm the original house. Furthermore, the proposed side extension would fail to provide an adequate gap to the flank boundary and would likely result in a terracing effect. The proposals are contrary to DP3, EX11, EX12, EX13, EX26 and EX27 of the Residential Extensions Guidelines SPD (2010), Saved Policies EN1, EN2 and H15 of the Slough Local Plan (2004), Core Policy 8 of the Core Strategy (2008) and contrary to Paragraphs 131 and 135 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024).
- It is the view of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed development does not improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area for the reasons given in this notice and it is not in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework.
- Drawings considered: - Drawing No. 01, dated 29.01.2025, received on 25.11.2025 - Drawing No. 02, dated 29.01.2025, received on 25.11.2025 - Drawing No. 03, dated 29.01.2025, received on 25.11.2025 - Drawing No. 04, dated 29.01.2025, received on 25.11.2025 - Drawing No. 05, dated 29.01.2025, received on 25.11.2025
