Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Retrospective application for a single storey front extension to form porch.
Proposal details
- Reference
- P/20274/001
- Alternative references
- PP-14810895
- Ward
- Farnham
- Agent
- Mr SIKANDAR ALI
- UPRN
- 100080310966
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 13 of 13
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-existing/Existing Side ElevationsSubmitted Plans and Details | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| Pre-existing/Existing Roof PlansSubmitted Plans and Details | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| Pre-existing/Existing Ground Floor PlanSubmitted Plans and Details | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| Pre-existing/Existing Front ElevationsSubmitted Plans and Details | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| Location plan and Block PlanSubmitted Plans and Details | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| Application Form - Without Personal DataApplication Form | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| Location plan and Block PlanAmended Plans | 29 Apr 2026 | View |
| Planning StatementStatement/Proof | 29 Apr 2026 | View |
| P-20274-001_-_170_Canterbury_Ave_REFUSAL.pdfDecisions | 21 May 2026 | View |
| Signed_Decision_Notice.pdfDecisions | 21 May 2026 | View |
| Appeal - RedactedAppeal Documents | 18 Jun 2026 | View |
| Appeal Questionnaire - RedactedAppeal Documents | 18 Jun 2026 | View |
| Appeal DecisionAppeal Documents | 23 Jul 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Decision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceConsultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Appeal status: Appeal lodged · Appeal Granted
P-20274-001_-_170_Canterbury_Ave_REFUSAL.pdf Signed_Decision_Notice.pdf Appeal DecisionPlanning conditions
- The front extension, by reason of its height, scale and bulk, together with its prominent siting forward of the established building line, represents a discordant, jarring, incongruous addition that fails to remain subordinate to the host property, resulting in harm to the character and appearance of the host property and the wider street scene. As such, the development represents poor design contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024, Core Policy 8 of the Slough Core Strategy 2006 - 2026 (adopted 2008), Policies H15, EN1 and EN2 of the Slough Local Plan (adopted 2004) and the Slough Residential Extension Guidelines (adopted 2010).
- The development hereby refused was submitted with the following plans and drawings: - Ground Floor Plans, Drg No. 2000/PL/01 - Roof Plans, Drg No. 2000/PL/02 - Front Elevations, Drg No. 2000/PL/03 - Side Elevations, Drg No. 2000/PL/04 - Location and Block Plans, Drg No. 2000/PL/05
- It is the view of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed development does not improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area for the reasons given in this notice and it is not in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework.
- against the decision of Slough Borough Council to refuse to grant planning permission
