Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Construction of a detached rear outbuilding to be used ancillary to the main dwelling
Proposal details
- Reference
- P/17806/002
- Alternative references
- PP-14615685
- Ward
- Upton
- Agent
- Janjua
- UPRN
- 100080336453
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 7 of 7
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Proposed floor plans & elevationsSubmitted Plans and Details | 12 Jan 2026 | View |
| Location planSubmitted Plans and Details | 12 Jan 2026 | View |
| Block PlanSubmitted Plans and Details | 12 Jan 2026 | View |
| Application Form - RedactedApplication Form | 12 Jan 2026 | View |
| Signed Decision NoticeDecisions | 26 Feb 2026 | View |
| Signed Officer ReportDecisions | 26 Feb 2026 | View |
| 6005836_Appeal_Decision.pdfAppeal Documents | 14 May 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Decision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceConsultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Appeal status: Appeal lodged · Appeal Dismissed
Signed Decision Notice Signed Officer Report 6005836_Appeal_Decision.pdfPlanning conditions
- The proposed outbuilding, by virtue of its positioning, footprint, height, scale, massing and bulk would result in a substantial loss of external amenity space and a subsequent cramped and overdeveloped appearance. The proposal is considered to be signifcantly harmful to the character and appearance of the area and it would make it difficult to resisit similar proposals. As such, the proposals are contrary to EX38, EX39 and EX48 of the Residential Extensions Guidelines SPD (2010), Saved Policies EN1, EN2 and H15 of the Slough Local Plan (2008), and Core Policy 8 of the Slough Core Strategy (2008), all of which refer to development needing to achieve high-quality design having regard to matters such as the relationship with the existing dwelling and providing adequate amenity space.
- It is the view of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed development does not improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area for the reasons given in this notice and it is not in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework.
- Drawings considered: - Site Location Plan, undated, received on 12/01/2026 - Block Plan, undated, received on 12/01/2026 - MOHAMADI/PLAN/001, dated 12/01/2026, received on 12/01/2026
- to refuse to grant planning permission
