Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Construction of a single storey front, side and rear extension and two storey side and rear extension
Proposal details
- Reference
- P/17121/001
- Alternative references
- PP-14611339
- Ward
- Langley Meads
- Agent
- Singh
- UPRN
- 100080326261
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 8 of 8
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| PhotographsPhotograph | 22 Jan 2026 | View |
| Application Form - RedactedApplication Form | 22 Jan 2026 | View |
| Existing & Proposed Floor Plans & Elevations, Block Plan & Location PlanSubmitted Plans and Details | 16 Feb 2026 | View |
| Decision NoticeDecisions | 2 Apr 2026 | View |
| Officers ReportDecisions | 2 Apr 2026 | View |
| AppealAppeal Documents | 29 May 2026 | View |
| Appeal QuestionnaireAppeal Documents | 1 Jun 2026 | View |
| Appeal DecisionAppeal Documents | 23 Jun 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Decision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceConsultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Appeal status: Appeal lodged · Appeal Dismissed
Decision Notice Officers Report Appeal DecisionPlanning conditions
- The proposed side and front extensions cumulatively, by virtue of their excessive scale, massing, design and siting, represent a discordant, jarring and incongruous addition to the host property. The proposed first floor side extension would also fail to retain an adequate perception of separation between properties and result in visual ‘terracing’ of the properties and therefore would result in visual harm to the streetscene and local character. The proposal represents poor design contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework, Core Policy 8 of the Slough Core Strategy 2006 - 2026 (adopted 2008), Policies H15, EN1 and EN2 of the Slough Local Plan (adopted 2004) and the Slough Residential Extension Guidelines (adopted 2010).
- The development hereby refused was submitted with the following plans and drawings: - Drg No. 39ML/12112025/REV-C
- In dealing with this application, the Local Planning Authority has decided that there are no amendments that would make the proposed development acceptable within the scope of the proposal description, and therefore none were requested. It is the view of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed development does not improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area for the reasons given in this notice and it is not in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework.
- against the decision of Slough Borough Council to refuse to grant planning permission
