Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Construction of a proposed first floor side and rear extension to existing dwelling and internal alterations.
Proposal details
- Reference
- P/15941/004
- Ward
- Langley Foxborough
- Agent
- Mr Shailender Nagpal
- UPRN
- 100080316065
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 9 of 9
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Location Plan and BlockSubmitted Plans/Documents | 9 Jul 2026 | View |
| Existing Floor PlansSubmitted Plans/Documents | 9 Jul 2026 | View |
| Existing Roof Plan and ElevationsSubmitted Plans/Documents | 9 Jul 2026 | View |
| Proposed Floor PlansSubmitted Plans/Documents | 9 Jul 2026 | View |
| Proposed Floor Plan and Roof PlanSubmitted Plans/Documents | 9 Jul 2026 | View |
| Proposed ElevationsSubmitted Plans/Documents | 9 Jul 2026 | View |
| _redacted Application FormSubmitted Plans/Documents | 9 Jul 2026 | View |
| Signed Decision NoticeDecisions | 25 Aug 2026 | View |
| Signed Officer ReportDecisions | 25 Aug 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Decision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceConsultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Signed Decision Notice Signed Officer ReportPlanning conditions
- The proposed extensions, together with the extensions already carried out to the dwelling, would fail to appear visually subordinate to the host dwelling and would instead overwhelm it, failing to respect the original design and form. The proposed first-floor side extension would not be set away from the boundary and would therefore substantially erode the existing spacious gap which is considered important for the estate character. Furthermore, the extensions in their totality, together with the insufficient amenity space and insufficient parking demonstrated, would result in an overdevelopment of the plot which is harmful to the character of the street scene and local area. The proposals are therefore contrary to Saved Policies EN1, EN2 and H15 of the Slough Local Plan (2004), policies DP1, DP2, DP3, EX11, EX26, EX40, EX42 and EX48 of the Residential Extensions Guidelines SPD (2010), Core Policies 7 and 8 of the Core Strategy and Policy DP3 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2026).
- It is the view of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed development does not improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area for the reasons given in this notice and it is not in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework.
