Council planning record

Demolition of existing commercial buildings and erection of a 8-storey residential building at the corner of Stoke Road and Stoke Gardens to provide 28 new dwellings with associated cycle parking and landscaping.

Rai Solicitors, 19, Stoke Road, Slough, SL2 5AH

Registered applicationReference: P/04557/013Slough Borough Council

Last published check: 2 Oct 2026, 20:19. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application location

Rai Solicitors, 19, Stoke Road, Slough, SL2 5AH

This record has no verified map location.

Application summary

Status
Registered application
Application type
Full Planning
Received
8 Jan 2026
Validated
28 Jan 2026
Determination deadline
25 Mar 2026
Local authority
Slough Borough Council

Application overview

Demolition of existing commercial buildings and erection of a 8-storey residential building at the corner of Stoke Road and Stoke Gardens to provide 28 new dwellings with associated cycle parking and landscaping.

Proposal details

Reference
P/04557/013
Alternative references
PP-14579030
Ward
Elliman
Agent
Mr Sukh Bal
UPRN
100081041572

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Documents 13 of 13

DocumentPublishedAction
File Size: 1191447, HREF: , Reference: Design and access statementSubmitted Plans and DetailsNot publishedView
File Size: 2927784, HREF: , Reference: Additional plansSubmitted Plans and DetailsNot publishedView
File Size: 10145433, HREF: , Reference: Additional plansSubmitted Plans and DetailsNot publishedView
Heritage StatementSubmitted Plans and Details8 Jan 2026View
Proposed DrawingsAmended Plans8 Jan 2026View
R1 compressedSubmitted Plans and Details8 Jan 2026View
R1Submitted Plans and Details8 Jan 2026View
_redacted application formApplication Form27 Jan 2026View
PEASubmitted Plans and Details8 Jan 2026View
_Fire StatementSubmitted Plans and Details8 Jan 2026View
_redacted Air Quality AssessmentSubmitted Plans and Details8 Jan 2026View
Energy StatementSubmitted Plans and Details28 Apr 2026View
Transport NoteSubmitted Plans and Details28 Apr 2026View

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Application date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  2. Received date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  3. Press notice start date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  4. Registration date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  5. Site notice date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  6. Valid date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  7. Decision due date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  8. Dispatch date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  9. Decision date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  10. Consultation expiry date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  11. Statutory expiry date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source

Decision & conditions

Refused; Informatives
Planning conditions
  1. For the avoidance of doubt this decision was made on the basis of the following plans: a) Drawing Number A100, Dated 20/02/2025, Received 08/01/2026 b) Drawing Number A200, Dated 20/02/2025, Received 08/01/2026 c) Drawing Number A201, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 d) Drawing Number A202, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 e) Drawing Number A203, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 f) Drawing Number A204, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 g) Drawing Number A205, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 h) Drawing Number A206, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 i) Drawing Number A207, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 j) Drawing Number A208, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 k) Drawing Number A209, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 l) Drawing Number A210, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 m) Drawing Number A211, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 n) Drawing Number A212, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 o) Drawing Number A213, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 p) Drawing Number A214, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 q) Drawing Number A215, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 r) Drawing Number A216, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 s) Drawing Number A217, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 t) Drawing Number A218, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 u) Drawing Number A219, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 v) Drawing Number A220, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 w) Drawing Number A221, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 x) Drawing Number A222, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 y) Drawing Number A223, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 z) Drawing Number A224, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026 aa) Drawing Number A225, Dated 15/07/2025, Received 08/01/2026
  2. It is the view of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed development does not improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area for the reasons given in this notice and it is not in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework. The applicant was given the opportunity to amend the application through the planning process however the amended plans did not address the concerns.
  3. The proposed development would, by virtue of its scale, bulk and appearance, result in a incongruous, dominant and overly strident addition to the streetscene that would be unsympathetic when viewed in the context of the site The proposal not help to achieve a high quality of design and would not enhance the quality of the built environment. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy EN1 of the Local Plan for Slough March 2004 and Core Policy 8 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2008 and the requirements of the NPPF.
  4. By virtue of the detail submitted with this application, the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed development will result in residential accommodation that achieves appropriate levels of natural daylight and sunlight to the proposed units and suitable internal noise levels. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy EN1 of the Local Plan for Slough March 2004 and Core Policy 8 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2008 and the requirements of the NPPF.
  5. The proposal would, if acceptable in other respects, be required to legally secure affordable housing units, provide for necessary infrastructure by way of appropriate financial contributions, and to secure a late stage financial viability review in respect to on-site and / or off-site affordable housing contributions, all of which would need to be secured by the completion of a section 106 agreement. No such agreement has been completed, contrary to Policies 4, 9 and 10 of the Slough Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2006 - 2026, Slough Borough Council’s Developers Guide Part 2 Developer Contributions and Affordable Housing (Section 106) and to the requirements of Regulation 61 of The Conservation of Habitats and Species (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.
  6. The proposed development, by virtue of the design and detailing of the northern elevation, would result in a building with an outlook spanning across numerous sites to the north and would compromise their potential for and ability to redevelop in the future. The proposal therefore compromises the ability for the area to undergo comprehensive regeneration and relies of adjacent land to provide amenity level and does not amount to, the best use of previously developed land, high quality design or considerate planning and is contrary to Core Policy 8 of the Core Strategy 2006-2026, policy EN1 of the Local Plan for Slough March 2004 and the advice of the NPPF.
  7. By virtue of the detail submitted with this application, the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the proposed development will not result in an adverse impact on the public highway in respect of the relationship to, and use of, the pedestrian crossing to the3 immediate south of the site. The proposal is therefore contrary to policy EN1 of the Local Plan for Slough March 2004 and Core Policies 7 and 8 of the Local Development Framework Core Strategy 2006-2026 and the requirements of the NPPF.
  8. The site lies within the zone of influence for recreational impacts to Burnham Beeches Special Area of Conservation (SAC) which considers that proposals for any net increase in residential units may have a likely significant effect on the qualifying features of the SAC through increased recreational pressure. The applicant, by virtue of not submitting a habitat regulations assessment, has failed to demonstrate that there would be no adverse impact on the SAC or provide suitable mitigation for any impacts that are identified. As such, the application is contrary to policy 9 of The Slough Local Development Framework, Core Strategy 2006 – 2026, Development Plan Document, December 2008, advice in the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 and to the requirements of Regulation 61 of The Conservation of Habitats and Species (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019.
Related records

Understand this planning record

All planning guides
  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.