Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Construction of a proposed single storey part rear and side extension following demolition of existing garage shed.
Proposal details
- Reference
- P/02512/003
- Alternative references
- PP-14818296
- Ward
- Cippenham Green
- Agent
- Mr Jegatheeban Balasingam
- UPRN
- 100080325547
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 11 of 11
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Existing/Proposed Ground Floor PlansSubmitted Plans and Details | 30 Mar 2026 | View |
| Proposed Block PlanSubmitted Plans and Details | 30 Mar 2026 | View |
| Existing Block PlanSubmitted Plans and Details | 30 Mar 2026 | View |
| Location PlanSubmitted Plans and Details | 30 Mar 2026 | View |
| Application Form - Without Personal DataApplication Form | 30 Mar 2026 | View |
| Existing/Proposed Front ElevationsSubmitted Plans and Details | 29 Apr 2026 | View |
| Existing/Proposed Rear ElevationsSubmitted Plans and Details | 29 Apr 2026 | View |
| Existing/Proposed Side ElevationsSubmitted Plans and Details | 29 Apr 2026 | View |
| Existing/Proposed Side ElevationsSubmitted Plans and Details | 29 Apr 2026 | View |
| Signed Decision NoticeDecisions | 18 Jun 2026 | View |
| Signed Officer ReportDecisions | 18 Jun 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Decision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceConsultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Signed Decision Notice Signed Officer ReportPlanning conditions
- The proposed wraparound extension, by virtue of its positioning, eaves height and ridge height, width, depth, footprint, scale, massing and bulk, would fail to appear as a subservient addition to the original dwelling and would instead be an unduly prominent addition that is readily seen in the streetscene. Furthermore, the future occupiers of the development would be left with an inadequate provision of external amenity space. The proposals are therefore contrary to Saved Policies EN1, EN2, H14 and H15 of the Slough Local Plan (2004), Core Policy 8 of the Core Strategy (2008), EX4, EX5, EX6 and EX48 of the Residential Extensions Guidelines SPD (2010), and contrary to Paragraphs 131 and 135 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2024) which requires development to achieve good design.
- It is the view of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed development does not improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area for the reasons given in this notice and it is not in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework.
- Drawings considered: - BJ/2026/19/01, dated 23/03/2026, received on 30/03/2026 - BJ/2026/19/02, dated 23/03/2026, received on 30/03/2026 - BJ/2026/19/03, dated 23/03/2026, received on 30/03/2026 - BJ/2026/19/04, dated 23/03/2026, received on 30/03/2026 - BJ/2026/19/05, dated 23/03/2026, received on 29/04/2026 - BJ/2026/19/06, dated 23/03/2026, received on 29/04/2026 - BJ/2026/19/07, dated 23/03/2026, received on 29/04/2026 - BJ/2026/19/08, dated 23/03/2026, received on 29/04/2026
