Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Construction of a proposed part single storey, part two storey side and rear extension to existing dwelling.
Proposal details
- Reference
- P/02486/005
- Alternative references
- PP-15098018
- Ward
- Baylis & Salt Hill
- Agent
- Hussain
- UPRN
- APRV588C5MR5705GXD
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 7 of 7
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Application Form - Without Personal DataSubmitted Plans/Documents | 21 Jul 2026 | View |
| Existing Floor Plans and ElevationsSubmitted Plans/Documents | 21 Jul 2026 | View |
| Proposed Floor Plans and ElevationsSubmitted Plans/Documents | 21 Jul 2026 | View |
| Location Plan and Block PlanSubmitted Plans/Documents | 21 Jul 2026 | View |
| Flood Risk AssessmentSubmitted Plans/Documents | 21 Jul 2026 | View |
| Signed Decision NoticeDecisions | 1 Sept 2026 | View |
| Signed Officer ReportDecisions | 1 Sept 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Decision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceConsultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Signed Decision Notice Signed Officer ReportPlanning conditions
- The proposed first-floor side and rear extension, by virtue of its positioning, height, width, depth, scale, unduly complicated roof form, massing and bulk, would fail to appear visually subordinate to the host dwelling and would instead overwhelm and dominate the site causing significant visual harm to the local area. This is exacerbated by the fact that the proposals would be readily seen from the public right of way that adjoins the site along the southern boundary. The proposals are therefore contrary to DP1, DP2, DP3, EX12, EX26 and EX28 of the Residential Extensions Guidelines SPD (2010), Saved Policies EN1, EN2 and H15 of the Slough Local Plan (2004), Core Policy 8 of the Core Strategy (2008) and Policy DP3 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2026).
- It is the view of the Local Planning Authority that the proposed development does not improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area for the reasons given in this notice and it is not in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework.
- Drawings considered: - UASS PL-100, date 07/11/2025, received on 21/07/2026 - UASS PL-200, date 07/11/2025, received on 21/07/2026 - UASS PL-201, date 07/11/2025, received on 21/07/2026
- The proposals, by virtue of their positioning, height, depth, width, massing, bulk and proximity to the boundary with No.36 Aldborough Spur, would significantly impact outlook and access to sunlight/daylight from that neighbour’s nearest habitable windows. Furthermore, the extensions would likely appear oppressive and overbearing to this neighbour by virtue of the limited separation distances involved, reducing their amenity to levels below that which they could reasonably expect to enjoy. The proposals are contrary to Saved Policies EN1, EN2 and H15 of the Slough Local Plan (2004), Core Policy 8 of the Core Strategy (2008) and contrary to DP6 and DP7 of the Residential Extensions Guidelines SPD (2010).
