Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Two storey side and rear extension including addition of dormer to south elevation
Proposal details
- Reference
- 26/002587/HHFUL
- Alternative references
- PP-15077415
- Development type
- Hseholder-inc sat dishes-not singleflats
- Ward
- Ravensthorpe
- Agent
- Mwaniki
- UPRN
- 100090198590
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 13 of 13
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Application FormDCAPFORM | 10 Jul 2026 | View |
| Location Plan - 279_A_001DCPLANS | 10 Jul 2026 | View |
| Site Plan - 279_A_002DCPLANS | 10 Jul 2026 | View |
| Existing Ground Floor Plan - 279_A_100DCPLANS | 10 Jul 2026 | View |
| Existing First Floor Plan - 279_A_101DCPLANS | 10 Jul 2026 | View |
| Proposed Ground Floor Plan - 279_A_102DCPLANS | 10 Jul 2026 | View |
| Biodiversity ChecklistDCSUPDOC | 10 Jul 2026 | View |
| Proposed Site Plan - 279_A_003 Rev BDCPLANS | 14 Jul 2026 | View |
| Proposed First Floor Plan - 279_A_103 Rev BDCPLANS | 14 Jul 2026 | View |
| Existing Elevations - 279_A_300 Rev BDCPLANS | 14 Jul 2026 | View |
| Proposed Elevations - 279_A_301 Rev BDCPLANS | 14 Jul 2026 | View |
| 77223_Decision_Notice_-_REFUSE.pdfDCDEC | 24 Aug 2026 | View |
| Officer reportDCCORPTP | 24 Aug 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
77223_Decision_Notice_-_REFUSE.pdfPlanning conditions
- By virtue of its size and scale and in particular, its large flat roof, the proposed extension would fail to respect the character of the dwelling. The proposal would not be compatible with the dwelling but would represent an incongruous addition to it which would fail to integrate with it in a satisfactory manner at all, an impact which would be exacerbated by the openness of the site and the prominence of the dwelling. Moreover, the proposed extension and the resulting dwelling would appear cramped within the plot and together with the lack of any similar extensions to the neighbouring dwellings, it would have a harmful impact upon the street scene. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy LP16 of the Peterborough Local Plan (2019) and the National Planning Policy Framework (2026).
- By virtue of the proximity of the side extension to the boundary with 9 Heaton Close and the kitchen window in the flank elevation of that dwelling facing 7, the proposed development would have an overbearing, visually intrusive and harmful impact upon the outlook and visual amenities of the occupiers of 9. The proposal would also result in the overshadowing of, and loss of light for, that window. The proposed development is therefore contrary to Policy LP17 of the Peterborough Local Plan (2019) and the National Planning Policy Framework (2026).
