Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Proposed dropped kerb
Proposal details
- Reference
- 26/002585/HHFUL
- Alternative references
- PP-15071135
- Development type
- Hseholder-inc sat dishes-not singleflats
- Ward
- Fletton & Stanground
- Agent
- Mirams
- UPRN
- 200001660974
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 10 of 10
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Application Form - RedactedDCAPFORM | 10 Jul 2026 | View |
| Existing Site Plan - SC505_P1DCPLANS | 6 Aug 2026 | View |
| Proposed Site Plan - SC505_P2DCPLANS | 6 Aug 2026 | View |
| Existing and Proposed Block Plan - SC505_P3DCPLANS | 6 Aug 2026 | View |
| Location Plan - SC505_P4DCPLANS | 6 Aug 2026 | View |
| Visibility Splay Block Plan - SC505_P5DCPLANS | 6 Aug 2026 | View |
| Application Form - Amended - RedactedDCAPFORM | 6 Aug 2026 | View |
| Local Highways Authority response - 4th Sept 2026DCCONWEB | 4 Sept 2026 | View |
| 80336_Decision_Notice_-_REFUSE.pdfDCDEC | 11 Sept 2026 | View |
| Officer reportDCCORPTP | 11 Sept 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
80336_Decision_Notice_-_REFUSE.pdfPlanning conditions
- By virtue of the increase in the risk of vehicle- to- vehicle and vehicle- to- pedestrian conflict that the proposal would create, due to the inability to provide the required pedestrian visibility splays within the red line of the site, and the proximity of the proposed access to the junction between St George Avenue and Southfields Avenue (less than the required 10m), the proposed development would be harmful to both highway and pedestrian safety. The insufficient size of the proposed parking space further highlights the shortfall in the acceptability of the application, potentially increasing pedestrian safety issues. Individually and cumulatively, the deficiencies in the proposed development would have an adverse impact upon driver and pedestrian safety. The proposed development is therefore contrary to Policy LP13 of the Peterborough Local Plan (2019) and the National Planning Policy Framework (2026).
