Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
First floor side and two storey rear extension to 57 and 59 Grange Road
Proposal details
- Reference
- 26/002547/FUL
- Development type
- Minor Other (includes telephone kiosks)
- Ward
- Ravensthorpe
- Agent
- Iqbal
- UPRN
- 100090196454
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 12 of 12
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Biodiversity ChecklistDCSUPDOC | 29 Jun 2026 | View |
| Existing Elevation Plan - 003DCPLANS | 29 Jun 2026 | View |
| Existing Floor Plan - 002DCPLANS | 29 Jun 2026 | View |
| Location Existing and Proposed Block Plan - 001DCPLANS | 29 Jun 2026 | View |
| Proposed First Floor and Elevation Plan - 005DCPLANS | 29 Jun 2026 | View |
| Proposed Ground Floor and Elevation Plan - 004DCPLANS | 29 Jun 2026 | View |
| Application FormDCAPFORM | 29 Jun 2026 | View |
| PCC Tree OfficerDCCONWEB | 30 Jul 2026 | View |
| Revised - Proposed Ground Floor and Elevation Plan Rev BDCPLANS | 11 Aug 2026 | View |
| Revised - Proposed First Floor and Elevation Plan Rev BDCPLANS | 11 Aug 2026 | View |
| 77104_Decision_Notice_-_REFUSE.pdfDCDEC | 21 Aug 2026 | View |
| Officer reportDCCORPTP | 24 Aug 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
77104_Decision_Notice_-_REFUSE.pdfPlanning conditions
- By virtue of the design and size of the extensions, including the variety of pitched and flat roofs to them to both dwellings, and the differing heights to the first floor side extensions, the proposed development would have a harmful inpact upon the character and appearance of the dwellings, both individually and as a pair. The extensions would be of a scale, design and form which would be harmful to, and would fail to respect the scale and proportions of, the dwellings and would represent incongruous additions to them, resulting in harm to their character and appearance. The proposed development is therefore contrary to Policy LP16 of the Peterborough Local Plan (2019) and the National Planning Policy Framework (2026).
- By virtue of the proximity of the side extension to 59 to the boundary with 61 Grange Road and the habitable room windows in the flank elevation of that dwelling facing 59, the proposed development would have an overbearing, visually intrusive and harmful impact upon the outlook and visual amenities of the occupiers of 61. The proposal would also result in the overshadowing of, and loss of light for, those windows. The proposed development is therefore contrary to Policy LP17 of the Peterborough Local Plan (2019) and the National Planning Policy Framework (2026).
