Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Discharge of condition C37 (ASHP equipment details) of 23/00615/REM pursuant to planning permission 24/01010/NONMAT
Proposal details
- Reference
- 26/00157/DISCHG
- Alternative references
- PP-14665052
- Development type
- Discharge of Condition(s)
- Ward
- Hampton Vale
- Parish
- Peterborough
- UPRN
- 10008072590
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 9 of 9
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Photograph of Site NoticeDCSNPHOT | 13 Feb 2026 | View |
| Photograph of Site NoticeDCSNPHOT | 13 Feb 2026 | View |
| Application Form: Redacted - Application FormDCAPFORM | 4 Feb 2026 | View |
| Application Supporting Document: ASHP Noise Assessment FinalDCSUPDOC | 4 Feb 2026 | View |
| Plans: ASHP Location Plan - SKEM-082-015EDCPLANS | 4 Feb 2026 | View |
| Application Supporting Document: Daikin Technical DataDCSUPDOC | 4 Feb 2026 | View |
| Previous/Parent decision notice: Copy of Decision: 24/01010/NONMATDCPRDEC | 5 Feb 2026 | View |
| Pollution ControlDCCONWEB | 9 Mar 2026 | View |
| DecisionDCDEC | 25 Mar 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Publicity end date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceConsultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceSite notice end date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision expiry date
Published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Previous/Parent decision notice: Copy of Decision: 24/01010/NONMAT DecisionPlanning conditions
- C37: Prior to the installation of any domestic microgeneration Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) equipment which would not represent permitted development by virtue of Class G, Part 14 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended), full details of the ASHP equipment shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The ASHP equipment shall be installed in accordance with the approved details. Reason: In the interests of sustainability and to ensure the Local Planning Authority retains control of the development in the interests of visual and neighbour amenity. Plans and documents submitted in support of the discharge of C37: - ASHP Location Plan (Drawing Number: SKEM/082-015 Rev E). - ASHP Noise Assessment. Produced by Air & Acoustic Consultants. (Dated February 2026). - Daikin Altherma low temperature monobloc technical data (Received 04.02.2026). Assessment: Having reviewed the submitted documents, Officers take the view that the submitted documentation is acceptable to the Local Planning Authority. The findings of the Air and Acoustics ASHP Noise Assessment (ref. 100834, Revision 01) are acknowledged. The noise modelling presented indicates that sound levels produced by nearby ASHP units will remain below 37dB LAeq(5min) at the relevant receptor points, thereby meeting the requirement set out in MSC 020(a). Regarding noise impacts on the dwelling served by the ASHP, the assessment concludes that internal noise levels based on an assumed 15dB reduction through an open window will remain within acceptable limits. It remains the developer's responsibility to demonstrate that the ASHP installations comply with the relevant noise standards, and this response is based solely on the information provided within the submitted assessment. The City Council's Environmental Health Officer has no objection. As such, the detail submitted is deemed acceptable for the Local Planning Authority to discharge the condition. Conclusion: The details submitted relating to condition 37 are deemed acceptable to the Local Planning Authority and comply with the submission requirements of the condition. Condition 37 is hereby discharged, subject to implementation in accordance with the approved details. This relates only to the residential parcel of Phase 1B (O-Land).
