Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Erection of domestic garage/ ancillary building.
Proposal details
- Reference
- 26/0211/PA
- Alternative references
- PP-14990121
- Ward
- Cilgerran And Eglwyswrw
- Agent
- Mr Llyr Evans
- UPRN
- 10009881002
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 0 of 0
No documents match this view.
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceSite notice end date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Planning conditions
- The proposed domestic garage/ancillary building would appear incongruous in its form, scale and external materials. In particular the proposal provides limited justification for the scale and height of the building. It’s design and appearance is poorly related to the traditional form of the dwelling, and it would be harmful to the character and appearance of the adjoining listed building, and the wider vernacular architecture of the locality. In particular the asymmetrical roof design and the scale and material finish would be at odds with the traditional character and appearance of the host dwelling and the immediately adjoining listed building and wider vernacular architecture. As such, the proposed development would create an unacceptable visual impact on the setting of the adjoining listed building, and would not protect or enhance the character of the wider local vernacular in conflict with policy GN.1, GN.2 and GN.38 of the LDP.
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
