Council planning record

Change of use from annex to C3 (Dwellinghouse) and partial demolition of stone wall for the provision of one parking bay.

Myrtle House, PENALLY, Tenby, Pembrokeshire, SA70 7PU

Decision MadeReference: 26/0031/PAPembrokeshire County Council

Last published check: 2 Oct 2026, 19:51. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application location

Myrtle House, PENALLY, Tenby, Pembrokeshire, SA70 7PU

This record has no verified map location.

Application summary

Status
Decision Made
Application type
Full
Received
15 Apr 2026
Validated
Not published
Determination deadline
9 Jun 2026
Local authority
Pembrokeshire County Council

Application overview

Change of use from annex to C3 (Dwellinghouse) and partial demolition of stone wall for the provision of one parking bay.

Proposal details

Reference
26/0031/PA
Alternative references
PP-14837597
Ward
Manorbier And Penally
Parish
SV_Penally
Agent
Miss Nia Williams
UPRN
10009877734

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Documents 0 of 0

No documents match this view.

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Application date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  2. Received date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  3. Registration date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  4. Site notice date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  5. Consultation expiry date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  6. Statutory expiry date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  7. Site notice end date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  8. Dispatch date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  9. Decision date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  10. Decision due date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source

Decision & conditions

Refused
Planning conditions
  1. The proposed removal of the stone boundary wall in order to create the off-street parking space, would fail to respect the character, context and spatial arrangement of the built form of the Penally Conservation Area along Hill Farm Road. The further interruption of this defining boundary feature would appear visually intrusive in views from the public realm and would cause harm to the special character and appearance of the Conservation Area., The proposal therefore fails to accord with criterion 1 of policy GN.1 (General Development Policy) and criteria 1 and 2 of policy GN.2 (Sustainable Design) and policy GN.38 (Protection and Enhancement of the Historic Environment) of the Local Development Plan (adopted 28 February 2013). Furthermore, the proposed development would be at odds with the aims of Technical Advice Note (TAN) 12: Design (2016) and Planning Policy Wales (Edition 12, February 2024).
  2. The application proposes the formation of a new off-road parking space. Due to the topography of the site and the physical constraints of the plot the proposed parking area would necessitate the construction of an elevated decked parking platform, or a similarly engineered structure, in order to provide a usable parking space wholly within the applicant’s land ownership. No details of the method of construction of the proposed parking space have been provided in order to indicate the integrity of the existing retaining wall structures or reinforcement have been submitted with regard to the safeguarding of the adjoining public highway. In the absence of this information, the proposal is therefore contrary to criterion 6 of Policy GN.1 of the Local Development Plan for Pembrokeshire (adopted 28 February 2013).
  3. The application proposes a new engineered access which would require clear visibility spays of 25m in either direction along Hill Farm Road, from the drivers position, with no obstruction exceeding 0.60 meters in height within the splays. In the absence such information, it cannot be demonstrated that the proposal would not give rise to highway safety issues. The proposal is therefore contrary to criterion 6 of Policy GN.1 of the Local Development Plan for Pembrokeshire (adopted 28 February 2013).
  4. The proposed introduction of the 1.8m high boundary fence, atop of the existing terrace wall, to separate Myrtle House from the proposed dwelling, would, due to their combined height, have an overbearing impact when viewed from the rear of Myrtle House. In such terms, proposal conflicts with criteria 1 and 2 of policy GN.1 (General Development Policy) and criteria 1 and 2 of policy GN.2 (Sustainable Design) of the Local Development Plan (adopted 28 February 2013), the advice set out in Technical Advice Note (TAN) 12: Design (2016) and Planning Policy Wales (Edition 12, February 2024).
  5. A3641 53 001 – Proposed Site Location Plan; A3641 53 002 - Proposed Site Block Plan; A3641 53 101 - Proposed Floor Plan; A3641 53 201 – Proposed Site Cross Section; A3641 53 301 – Proposed N, E & W Elevations; and A3641 53 001 – Proposed S & E Elevations.
Related records

Understand this planning record

All planning guides
  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.