Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Single storey extension to side & rear and erection of dormers to front & rear to serve rooms in roofspace
Proposal details
- Reference
- 26/0264/FUL
- Ward
- Trimdon
- Agent
- Boyd
- UPRN
- 100110141480
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 9 of 9
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Location planDrawing | 19 Jun 2026 | View |
| Existing plans & elevations Dwg no. 2026/SK/01Drawing | 19 Jun 2026 | View |
| Proposed plans & elevations Dwg no. 2026/SK/02Drawing | 19 Jun 2026 | View |
| Existing & proposed site plans & side elevations 2026/SK/03Drawing | 19 Jun 2026 | View |
| Application form redactedApplication Form | 19 Jun 2026 | View |
| Consultee Notification ListConsultation Notification List | 24 Jun 2026 | View |
| Neighbour Notification ListNeighbour Notification List | 24 Jun 2026 | View |
| Decision NpticeDecision | 13 Aug 2026 | View |
| Officer ReportReport | 13 Aug 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Decision NpticePlanning conditions
- Impact on the street scene and character and appearance of the area In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority the extension would harmfully disrupt the rhythm and spacing between the semi-detached properties which would have a detrimental impact on the street scene and character and appearance of the area contrary to the requirements of Policy CS5(c), DC1 (b), Emerging Plan Policy, CR2 (e), CR3(a) and Design Guidance.
- Unsuitable parking provision In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, due to the likely high useage of the immediate area by pedestrians and due to the awkward arrangement of the proposed parking, when taking into account existing restrictions, the proposal would result in significant detriment to highway safety contrary to the requirements of DC1 (test d) and Emerging Plan Policy CR2(l).
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
