Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Two storey extension to side
Proposal details
- Reference
- 26/0077/FUL
- Alternative references
- PP-14673871
- Ward
- Coulby Newham
- Parish
- Parish buffer = Stainton and Thornton CP
- Agent
- Pyramid Architectural Designs
- UPRN
- 100110135814
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 10 of 10
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Proposed site plan Dwg no. 004ADrawing | 16 Feb 2026 | View |
| Existing site plan Dwg no. 003ADrawing | 16 Feb 2026 | View |
| Proposed plans & elevations Dwg no. 002ADrawing | 16 Feb 2026 | View |
| Existing floor plans & elevations Dwg no. 001ADrawing | 16 Feb 2026 | View |
| Location planDrawing | 16 Feb 2026 | View |
| Application form redactedApplication Form | 16 Feb 2026 | View |
| Consultee Notification ListConsultation Notification List | 17 Feb 2026 | View |
| Neighbour Notification ListNeighbour Notification List | 17 Feb 2026 | View |
| Decision NoticeDecision | 23 Apr 2026 | View |
| Officer reportReport | 23 Apr 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceExtension date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Decision NoticePlanning conditions
- Adverse impact on the character and appearance of the area In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the proposed development, by virtue of its size, design and position is considered to be in conflict with Local Development Plan Policies DC1(b) (General Development), CS5(c&f) (Design), Emerging Policies CR2, CR3 and the Middlesbrough Design Guide, as it would result in an extension to the side of the property which would be of an excessive scale relative to the site circumstances, resulting in a disproportionate built form which would have a prominent impact on the streetscene and fails to integrate successfully with the host dwelling.
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
