Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Single storey extensions to front, side and rear
Proposal details
- Reference
- 25/0584/FUL
- Alternative references
- PP-14458601
- Ward
- Marton West
- Parish
- Parish buffer = Nunthorpe CP
- Agent
- Michael Gales
- UPRN
- 100110096523
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 8 of 8
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Location planDrawing | 4 Nov 2025 | View |
| Application form redactedApplication Form | 4 Nov 2025 | View |
| Existing & proposed plans & elevations Dwg no. EC-2025-06-D017 REV P4Drawing | 10 Nov 2025 | View |
| Existing & proposed site plan Dwg no. EC-2025-06-D018 REV P4Drawing | 10 Nov 2025 | View |
| Consultee Notification ListConsultation Notification List | 11 Nov 2025 | View |
| Neighbour Notification ListNeighbour Notification List | 11 Nov 2025 | View |
| Decision NoticeDecision | 23 Jan 2026 | View |
| Officer ReportReport | 23 Jan 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceExtension date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Decision NoticePlanning conditions
- 1. Out of Keeping Design and Scale In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the extension by virtue of its size, scale and design, is considered to be out of keeping with the host property and immediate surroundings, being contrary to the design requirements of the Local Development Plan Policies DC1 (b) (General Development), CS5 (c&f) (Design), the Middlesbrough Design Guide and the emerging Publication Local Plan policies CR2 (e) (General Development Principles) and CR3 (a, c and k) (Sustainable and High Quality Design), as it would result in an extension to the side / rear / front of the property which would be of an excessive scale and would have an incongruous appearance which fails to respect the character and appearance of the host property and wider street scene. olicy DC1.
- 2. Adverse Impact on Amenity In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the front, side and rear extension, due to its size and proximity is considered to have a significant negative impact on the amenity associated with 13 Brass Castle Lane and is contrary to the Urban Design SPD and Local Plan Policy DC1.
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
