Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Two storey extension to side with pitched roof and single storey extension to rear
Proposal details
- Reference
- 25/0560/FUL
- Ward
- Kader
- Agent
- Planrite
- UPRN
- 100110123555
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 12 of 12
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Covering letterSupporting Documents | 16 Oct 2025 | View |
| Existing plans & elevationsDrawing | 16 Oct 2025 | View |
| Location planDrawing | 16 Oct 2025 | View |
| Proposed plans & elevationsDrawing | 16 Oct 2025 | View |
| Neighbour Notification ListNeighbour Notification List | 7 Nov 2025 | View |
| Consultee Notification ListConsultation Notification List | 7 Nov 2025 | View |
| Existing plans & elevations Dwg no. MG0024Drawing | 8 Jan 2026 | View |
| Proposed plans & elevations Dwg no. HG003Drawing | 8 Jan 2026 | View |
| Site planDrawing | 8 Jan 2026 | View |
| Application form redactedApplication Form | 9 Jan 2026 | View |
| Decision NoticeDecision | 30 Jan 2026 | View |
| Officer ReportReport | 30 Jan 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceExtension date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Decision NoticePlanning conditions
- Adverse impact on character and appearance of the area In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the two-storey extension by virtue of its size and location is considered to be in conflict with Local Development Plan Policies DC1, CS5, emerging local plan policies CR1, CR2, CR3 and the Middlesbrough Design Guide, as it is not suitably scaled or proportionate to the host dwelling. This massing would therefore adversely impact the host dwelling, street scene and wider character and appearance of the area.
- Adverse highway impacts In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the proposed development is considered to be in conflict with Local Development Plan Policy DC1 (General Development) and the Tees Valley Design Guide as it would result in undue pressure for on street parking due to the increase in bedrooms, which would in turn adversely affect the free flow of traffic and pedestrian safety.
- Insufficient information The plans that have been submitted are insufficient due to a lack of detail. Therefore the Local Planning Authority is unable to accurately assess the impact of the extension. The development is considered to be in conflict with the requirements of policy DC1 (a).
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
