Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Variation of condition 3 (Approved plans) on planning application 23/0259/FUL to alter window and door position and widen entrance
Proposal details
- Reference
- 25/0013/VAR
- Alternative references
- PP-13680139
- Agent
- Lee Wardman
- UPRN
- 100110145787
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 11 of 11
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Proposed plans & elevations Dwg no. L023001-002Drawing | 8 Jan 2025 | View |
| Application form redactedApplication Form | 8 Jan 2025 | View |
| Proposed Floor & Elevations Plans Rev BRevised Drawing | 25 Feb 2025 | View |
| Decision NoticeDecision | 28 Feb 2025 | View |
| Officer ReportReport | 28 Feb 2025 | View |
| Appellant's Grounds for AppealAppellant`s Case | 16 Apr 2025 | View |
| Appeal FormAppeal Form | 16 Apr 2025 | View |
| Inspectorate Appeal Start LetterAppeal Start Letter | 25 Apr 2025 | View |
| LPA QuestionnaireAppeal Questionnaire | 30 Apr 2025 | View |
| Appeal Neighbour Notification ListAppeal Correspondence | 14 May 2025 | View |
| Appeal DecisionAppeal Decision | 31 Jul 2025 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Decision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Appeal status: Appeal lodged · Appeal Dismissed
Decision Notice Appeal DecisionPlanning conditions
- 1. Inappropriate Design In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the porch extension by virtue of its size and low quality design, is considered to be overdevelopment and out of keeping with the host property and immediate surroundings, being contrary to the design requirements of the Urban Design SPD and Local Plan Policies DC1 and CS5.
- 2. Adverse Impact on Amenity In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the porch, due to its length, height and proximity is considered to have a significant negative impact on the amenity associated with 101 York Road and is contrary to the Urban Design SPD and Local Plan Policy DC1 and CS5.
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
