Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Two-storey extension to the side and rear
Proposal details
- Reference
- 24/0275/FUL
- Alternative references
- PP-13238748
- Ward
- Marton East
- Agent
- D. D. Design Ltd
- UPRN
- 10023181446
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 11 of 11
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Existing and proposed plansDrawing | 15 Jul 2024 | View |
| Application Form - Without Personal DataApplication Form | 15 Jul 2024 | View |
| Neighbour Notification ListNeighbour Notification List | 17 Jul 2024 | View |
| Proposed & Existing PlansRevised Drawing | 4 Sept 2024 | View |
| Officer ReportReport | 13 Sept 2024 | View |
| Decision NoticeDecision | 13 Sept 2024 | View |
| Appeal FormAppeal Form | 8 Nov 2024 | View |
| Neighbours Notified of AppealNeighbour Notification List | 14 Nov 2024 | View |
| Appeal Start LetterAppeal Start Letter | 14 Nov 2024 | View |
| LPA QuestionnaireAppeal Questionnaire | 14 Nov 2024 | View |
| Appeal DecisionAppeal Decision | 29 Apr 2025 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceExtension date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Appeal status: Appeal lodged · Appeal Dismissed
Decision Notice Appeal DecisionPlanning conditions
- Design and Appearance In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the overall scale, design and appearance of the two-storey extension, the loss of a significant proportion of the front garden area to driveway, and the loss of the gap between properties is considered to have a significant harmful impact on the existing character and appearance of the property, the adjacent property and the area. The development is considered to be contrary to the guidance set out in Core Strategy Policy DC1 (b & c) and CS5 (c & f), the UDSPD (Section 5 Householder /Domestic Development) and Paragraph 135 of the NPPF.
- Amenity of neighbours – 135 Low Gill View In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the cumulative impact of the two-storey extension to the side/rear, by virtue of it’s height, projection and proximity to the neighbours property is considered to have a significant overbearing impact and resulting loss of light to the neighbours at 135 Low Gill View, contrary to Core Strategy Policy DC1 (c).
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
