Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Single storey extensions to rear and dormer window extension to side
Proposal details
- Reference
- 24/0263/FUL
- Alternative references
- PP-13214895
- Ward
- Linthorpe
- Agent
- ANDREW RILEY
- UPRN
- 100110131902
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 10 of 10
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| The location planDrawing | 5 Jul 2024 | View |
| Proposed Floor Plans - 02Drawing | 5 Jul 2024 | View |
| Proposed Elevations - 04Drawing | 5 Jul 2024 | View |
| Existing Floor Plans - 01Drawing | 5 Jul 2024 | View |
| Existing Elevations - 03Drawing | 5 Jul 2024 | View |
| Application Form - Without Personal DataApplication Form | 5 Jul 2024 | View |
| Neighbour Notification ListNeighbour Notification List | 23 Jul 2024 | View |
| Proposed Ground Floor & Site PlanDrawing | 14 Aug 2024 | View |
| Decision NoticeDecision | 30 Aug 2024 | View |
| Officer ReportReport | 4 Sept 2024 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Decision NoticePlanning conditions
- Overdevelopment and Incongrous Design In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the proposed extensions and dormer, by virtue of their cumulative mass and design, represent an overdevelopment of the site and in part an incongrous design, being contrary to the design requirements of the Urban Design SPD and Policies DC1(b) and CS5(f).
- Impact on Amenity In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the rear extension, due to its length, height and proximity is considered to have a significant negative impact on the amenity associated with 48 Reeth Road, being contrary to the Urban Design SPD and Local Plan Policy DC1 and CS5.
- Insufficient Parking In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the creation of a fifth bedroom in the dormer extension combined with the inadequate provision of parking would result in a harm to the safety of pedestrians and others using the immediate area, being contrary to Local Plan Policy DC1(d).
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
