Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Rear dormer extension and one front rooflight
Proposal details
- Reference
- 23/0018/FUL
- Alternative references
- PP-11819763
- Ward
- Nunthorpe
- Parish
- Nunthorpe Parish Council, Parish buffer = Nunthorpe CP
- Agent
- Chris Barber
- UPRN
- 200000259920
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 9 of 9
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Block planDrawing | 9 Jan 2023 | View |
| Existing & proposed plans & elevationsDrawing | 9 Jan 2023 | View |
| Application form redactedApplication Form | 9 Jan 2023 | View |
| Location planDrawing | 12 Jan 2023 | View |
| Neighbour Notification ListNeighbour Notification List | 9 Feb 2023 | View |
| Heritage statementSupporting Documents | 22 Feb 2023 | View |
| Parking plan 01 - existing and proposedDrawing | 22 Feb 2023 | View |
| Decision NoticeDecision | 22 Mar 2023 | View |
| Comments MBC ConservationConsultee Comment | 23 Mar 2023 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourcePublicity end date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Decision NoticePlanning conditions
- Adverse Impact on Character In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the proposed dormer extension by reason of the design, size and location, is considered to be out of keeping with the design of the host property, would introduce a bulky and dominant extension to the existing property and would be detrimental to the positive character of the conservation area, being in conflict with Local Development Plan Policies DC1 (General Development), CS4 (Sustainable Development) and CS5 (Design), the Middlesbrough Urban Design Guide and the National Planning Policy Framework which aim to secure a high level of design for all developments and which aim to ensure harm is not imposed on heritage assets.
- Impact on amenity and privacy In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, the scale and position of the proposed dormer would be somewhat overbearing on the outdoor amenity space to the rear of the attached neighbouring property, and in view of its prominance, would give rise to a perception of overlooking and reduction in privacy associated with the adjacent property, contrary to Local Plan Policy CS5.
