Council planning record

Side extension and infilling rear extension and associated fenestration additions and alterations.

2A, Walpole Road, Twickenham, TW2 5SN

The decision has been made on the application.Reference: PA26/2442London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

Last published check: 4 Oct 2026, 14:02. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application location

2A, Walpole Road, Twickenham, TW2 5SN

This record has no verified map location.

Application summary

Status
The decision has been made on the application.
Application type
Householder Application
Received
13 Jul 2026
Validated
14 Jul 2026
Determination deadline
7 Sept 2026
Local authority
London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

Application overview

Side extension and infilling rear extension and associated fenestration additions and alterations.

Proposal details

Reference
PA26/2442
Alternative references
PP-15075436
Ward
South Twickenham Ward [STT]
Agent
Howe
UPRN
10070708428

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Documents 18 of 18

DocumentPublishedAction
Application Form - Without Personal DataApplication Form - Redacted13 Jul 2026View
FLOOD MAPReport13 Jul 2026View
Community Infrastructure Levy - Completed formApplication Form13 Jul 2026View
LOCATION Plan ref.: 2089-P001Submitted Drawing13 Jul 2026View
EXISTING PLANS ref.: 2089-P002Submitted Drawing13 Jul 2026View
EXISTING ELEVATIONS ref.: 2089-P003Submitted Drawing13 Jul 2026View
EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN ref.: 2089-P010Submitted Drawing13 Jul 2026View
PROPOSED PLANS ref.: 2089-P110Submitted Drawing13 Jul 2026View
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ref.: 2089-P111 Rev ASubmitted Drawing13 Jul 2026View
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ref.: 2089-P130Submitted Drawing13 Jul 2026View
ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT & METHOD STATEMENT ref.: 25_5837_11_92 Version 2Report6 Jul 2026View
PROPOSED SUDS PLAN ref.: 2089-P130Submitted Drawing13 Jul 2026View
PROPOSED STREET VIEW FRONT ELEVATIONSubmitted Drawing13 Jul 2026View
Planning fire safety strategy ref.: PFSS-001 Rev AReport13 Mar 2026View
Structural foundation statement and construction methodology ref.: AB/ 1726~srep 01Report20 Jun 2026View
Structural drawings ref.: L/1726-01, 02, 03, 04 and 07 Rev P1Submitted Drawing15 Jul 2026View
decisionDecision Notice7 Sept 2026View
Officer ReportReport7 Sept 2026View

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Application date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  2. Received date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  3. Registration date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  4. Valid date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  5. Press notice start date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  6. Site notice date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  7. Consultation expiry date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  8. Publicity end date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  9. Site notice end date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  10. Statutory expiry date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  11. Dispatch date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  12. Decision date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  13. Decision due date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source

Decision & conditions

Refused Permission
decision
Planning conditions
  1. The proposed extensions, by reason of their unacceptable height, depth and width, siting, design, size, mass, bulk and form, would represent an unsympathetic, incongruous and visually obtrusive form of development that fails to appear subordinate to the host property to the detriment of the visual amenity of the street scene and the overall setting, character and appearance of the conservation area. The proposal therefore fails to comply with, in particular, Policies 15, 28 and 29 of the Local Plan (2025), the House Extensions and External Alterations SPD (2015), the Twickenham Village Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning Document (2018), the London Plan (2021) and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) (2026).
  2. The application, by failing to provide sufficiently detailed and justified SuDS measures supported by infiltration testing, has not demonstrated that acceptable runoff rates would be achieved by the development in compliance with Chapter 18 of the NPPF (2026), policies SI12 and SI13 of the London Plan (2021) and policy 8 of the Richmond upon Thames Local Plan (2025).
  3. For the avoidance of doubt the Drawing(s) No(s) and Document(s) to which this decision refers are as follows:- Planning fire safety strategy ref.: PFSS-001 Rev A dated 13 March 2026. Structural foundation statement and construction methodology ref.: AB/ 1726~srep 01 dated 20 June 2026. ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT & METHOD STATEMENT ref.: 25_5837_11_92 Version 2 dated 6 July 2026. FLOOD MAP LOCATION Plan ref.: 2089-P001 EXISTING PLANS ref.: 2089-P002 EXISTING ELEVATIONS ref.: 2089-P003 EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN ref.: 2089-P010 PROPOSED PLANS ref.: 2089-P110 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ref.: 2089-P111 Rev A PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN ref.: 2089-P130 PROPOSED SUDS PLAN ref.: 2089-P130 – all received 13 July 2026. Structural drawings ref.: L/1726-01, 02, 03, 04 and 07 Rev P1 – received 15 July 2026.
  4. In accordance with paragraphs 38-42 of the National Planning Policy Framework, Richmond upon Thames Borough Council takes a positive and proactive approach to the delivery of sustainable development, by: * Providing a formal pre-application service * Providing written policies and guidance, all of which is available to view on the Council's website * Where appropriate, negotiating amendments to secure a positive decision * Determining applications in a timely manner. In this instance: * The applicants did not seek formal pre-application advice, and the scheme was found to be contrary to policy and guidance, and subsequently refused. The Council is ready to enter into discussions, through the Council's formal pre-application service, to advise the applicants of relevant policy and guidance; and where possible assist in the preparation of a new planning permission. More information on the pre-application service and relevant fees can be found online at www.richmond.gov.uk/pre-application_for_developers.
Related records

Understand this planning record

All planning guides
  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.