Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
We are acting on behalf of the property owner in relation to two trees located within the front garden of the above address, and we hereby submit a request for consent to undertake tree removal works. Following a detailed visual tree assessment, one of the trees (Tree 1 – Coast Redwood) has been identified as having a substantial basal decay cavity (rot pocket) at the base of the main stem. This defect indicates advanced fungal decay, significantly reducing the structural integrity and load-bearing capacity of the tree. As a result, the tree presents an elevated risk of stem failure, particularly under dynamic loading conditions such as high winds. Given the tree’s location adjacent to the public highway and property frontage, its failure would present a foreseeable risk to pedestrians, vehicles, and nearby structures. In our professional opinion, the risk level is no longer acceptable, and remedial pruning would not sufficiently mitigate the structural concerns. Therefore, removal is recommended as the most appropriate course of action. The second tree (Tree 2 – Oak Tree), positioned in close proximity, is of limited physiological quality and exhibits constrained growth due to spatial competition. Its retention would not be sustainable in the long term, and removal is proposed in conjunction with Tree 1 to allow for appropriate future replanting and site management. All works will be carried out in accordance with BS3998:2010 (Tree Work – Recommendations). Prior to commencement, checks will be undertaken to ensure compliance with wildlife legislation, including inspection for nesting birds and protected species. We kindly request confirmation as to whether the trees are subject to a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) and/or located within a Conservation Area, and we seek formal consent to proceed with the proposed works. Please find attached photographs of the trees and the identified defects in support of this application.
Proposal details
- Reference
- PA26/2143
- Alternative references
- PP-15020005
- Ward
- Barnes Ward [BRN]
- Agent
- Rayssoul
- UPRN
- 100022290524
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 8 of 8
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Application Form - Without Personal DataApplication Form - Redacted | 17 Jun 2026 | View |
| MEDIA PLAYEROther plans | 17 Jun 2026 | View |
| PHOTO OF HOLE IN TREE ROOTPhoto | 17 Jun 2026 | View |
| TREE PHOTOPhoto | 17 Jun 2026 | View |
| TREE LOCATION PLANSubmitted Drawing | 17 Jun 2026 | View |
| Provisional Tree Preservation Order TP26/0014 - YewLegal Document | 1 Sept 2026 | View |
| Regulation 5 noticeConsultations | 1 Sept 2026 | View |
| DecisionDecision Notice | 1 Sept 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Decision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision expiry date
Published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
DecisionPlanning conditions
- This is notice to let you know that on 29 July 2026 the Council made the above Tree Preservation Order No. TP26/0014. A copy of the Order will be delivered to the applicants address. In summary it prohibits anyone from cutting down, topping or lopping any of the trees described in the First Schedule and shown on the map, without the Council's Consent. The Council has made the Order on the following grounds: ''A Section 211 Notification (Ref: PA26/2143) was received by the Council proposing the removal of two trees within the front garden of the property. A Council Arboricultural Officer carried out an assessment of the trees and reviewed the information submitted in support of the proposed works. The evidence provided in support of the application does not support the conclusions reached within the accompanying statement. The substantial basal decay cavity referred to as affecting the "Coast Redwood" is associated with the adjacent oak and not the tree identified for removal. The tree identified as a Coast Redwood has been incorrectly identified and is in fact a Yew. The Yew appears to be in good physiological condition, with no significant defects evident from the information submitted, and retains considerable landscape value. Positioned prominently within the front garden, the tree is clearly visible from the public realm and makes a positive contribution to the character of the street scene through its evergreen form, screening value and year-round presence. The loss of this tree would therefore have a notable detrimental impact upon the local and wider landscape. The justification that has been provided is insufficient to demonstrate that the tree requires removal, and it is considered expedient in the interest of amenity to safeguard the tree with this Tree Preservation Order.'' The Council has separately considered the Oak tree referred to within this notification. The defects identified within the supporting information relate to this tree and not the Yew which is the subject of the Tree Preservation Order. Whilst the Oak contributes to the surrounding treescape, the evidence submitted demonstrates the presence of a substantial basal cavity and associated decay. In the circumstances, the Council does not consider it expedient to make a Tree Preservation Order in respect of the Oak and therefore 'raises no objection' to its removal as proposed.
- This is notice to let you know that on 29 July 2026 the Council made the above Tree Preservation Order No. TP26/0014. A copy of the Order will be delivered to the applicants address. In summary it prohibits anyone from cutting down, topping or lopping any of the trees described in the First Schedule and shown on the map, without the Council's Consent. The Council has made the Order on the following grounds: A Section 211 Notification (Ref: PA26/2143) was received by the Council proposing the removal of two trees within the front garden of the property. A Council Arboricultural Officer carried out an assessment of the trees and reviewed the information submitted in support of the proposed works. The evidence provided in support of the application does not support the conclusions reached within the accompanying statement. The substantial basal decay cavity referred to as affecting the "Coast Redwood" is associated with the adjacent oak and not the tree identified for removal. The tree identified as a Coast Redwood has been incorrectly identified and is in fact a Yew. The Yew appears to be in good physiological condition, with no significant defects evident from the information submitted, and retains considerable landscape value. Positioned prominently within the front garden, the tree is clearly visible from the public realm and makes a positive contribution to the character of the street scene through its evergreen form, screening value and year-round presence. The loss of this tree would therefore have a notable detrimental impact upon the local and wider landscape. The justification that has been provided is insufficient to demonstrate that the tree requires removal, and it is considered expedient in the interest of amenity to safeguard the tree with this Tree Preservation Order. The Council has separately considered the Oak tree referred to within this notification. The defects identified within the supporting information relate to this tree and not the Yew which is the subject of the Tree Preservation Order. Whilst the Oak contributes to the surrounding treescape, the evidence submitted demonstrates the presence of a substantial basal cavity and associated decay. In the circumstances, the Council does not consider it expedient to make a Tree Preservation Order in respect of the Oak and therefore 'raises no objection' to its removal as proposed.
