Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
T3. Holm Oak Rear Garden: The southern aspect of the tree has an Irregular crown structure and extends significantly over neighbouring gardens, potentially causing shading or encroachment. Reduce the southern flank of the lower crown by 1.5m to blend naturally with the existing canopy or close to the boundary line. (Previously reduced) Reduce the lateral spread by 2m from the adjacent flats to provide a 3.5m. This will help manage the tree’s form, reduce overhang, and mitigate any potential conflicts with neighbouring properties. Raise the low canopy all around to level. Remove dead branches throughout the crown area that are over 2.5cm in diameter, and inspect the crown for any adversities. The tree's current height is 19m, and its crown spread is 19m After the proposed works, the tree's height is 14m, and the crown spread is 12m (Not radial)
Proposal details
- Reference
- PA26/1272
- Alternative references
- PP-14853279
- Ward
- Fulwell & Hampton Hill Ward [FLW]
- Agent
- Parkin
- UPRN
- 100023686685
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 3 of 3
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Application Form - Without Personal DataApplication Form - Redacted | 13 Apr 2026 | View |
| Tree Location PlanSubmitted Drawing | 13 Apr 2026 | View |
| DecisionDecision Notice | 8 Jun 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Decision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision expiry date
Published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
DecisionPlanning conditions
- Refusal (in part) The application is partially refused: There is a lack of clarity regarding the current and proposed height of the tree, with an indicated reduction of approximately 5 metres. No detailed specification has been provided to support this extent of work, and no arboricultural evidence has been submitted to justify such a significant height reduction. In addition, no clear justification has been provided for the proposed crown lift, and the extent of pruning has not been quantified in measured terms (metres). In the absence of sufficient detail and supporting information, the Council is unable to properly assess the necessity or impact of these elements of the proposal. As such, the proposed height reduction and crown lifting are considered unsupported and cannot be approved at this time. Approval (in part) The following works are approved: Reduce the southern flank of the lower crown by approximately 1.5 metres, blending naturally with the existing canopy or back towards the boundary line (previously reduced). Reduce the lateral spread by approximately 2 metres from the adjacent flats to achieve a clearance of 3.5 metres. These works are considered reasonable and consistent with previous management, and are acceptable in arboricultural terms.
- The proposed work is to be carried out to British Standard 3998 (2010) Tree Work Recommendations, by a reputable tree surgeon to the satisfaction of the Tree Preservation Officer who should be informed of the date of commencement of work.
- The applicant's attention is drawn to Section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, by which an appeal may be made to the Secretary of State within 28 days of notification of this decision.
