Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
TPO 71/11 - T14 (Lime) and T16 (Hornbeam) - 3 - 4m height reduction and 2m width reduction. (Summary).
Proposal details
- Reference
- 2126/26
- Alternative references
- PP-15092388
- Ward
- Wanstead Village
- Agent
- Bailey
- UPRN
- 100023684153
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 5 of 5
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 046938 - site photos.docxPhotographs | 17 Jul 2026 | View |
| Tree planSupporting document | 21 Jul 2026 | View |
| ApplicationFormRedacted_v2.pdfApplication form | 21 Jul 2026 | View |
| OFFREP_8257520260812122729.pdfOfficer report | 12 Aug 2026 | View |
| 2091023_Tree_Decision_WTPO_Refused.pdfDecision notice | 13 Aug 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Publicity end date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
2091023_Tree_Decision_WTPO_Refused.pdfPlanning conditions
- Consent is refused for the following works: T14 (Lime) and T16 (Hornbeam) - 3 - 4m height reduction, 2m width reduction. The proposed reductions are unjustified as insufficient arboricultural evidence has been provided to demonstrate the need for the works. The extent of pruning would result in an unnecessary loss of crown cover and harm the trees' natural form and visual amenity, with no evidence of defects or other conditions requiring such intervention.
