Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Front driveway. Single storey rear extension. Detached rear outbuilding. (Summary).
Proposal details
- Reference
- 2047/26
- Alternative references
- PP-15125543
- Ward
- Fullwell
- Agent
- DAHIYA
- UPRN
- 100022204482
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 11 of 11
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| ApplicationFormRedacted.pdfApplication form | 1 Aug 2026 | View |
| NH-151-Location Plan.pdfSite/block plan | 1 Aug 2026 | View |
| NH-151-PL-001.pdfExisting plan | 1 Aug 2026 | View |
| NH-151-PL-004.pdfProposed plan | 1 Aug 2026 | View |
| NH-151-PL-005.pdfProposed plan | 1 Aug 2026 | View |
| NH-151-PL-006.pdfCombined plan | 1 Aug 2026 | View |
| Planning Statement.pdfPlanning statement | 1 Aug 2026 | View |
| Reasonable Exception Statement.pdfFire statement | 1 Aug 2026 | View |
| Design and access statement.pdfDesign and access statement | 1 Aug 2026 | View |
| 2096307_Decision_Full_Householder_FULR.pdfDecision notice | 28 Sept 2026 | View |
| 2047.26.pdfOfficer report | 28 Sept 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourcePublicity end date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
2096307_Decision_Full_Householder_FULR.pdfPlanning conditions
- The details submitted with this application are insufficient and inaccurate because they fail to provide satisfactory evidence to demonstrate that the proposed outbuilding would not have a serious and adverse effect on the mature trees in proximity of the development areas/ with the side and rear boundaries of the application site, and without which this Council is unable to fully assess the application. Thus, it is contrary to the requirements Policies LP24 and LP38 of the Local Plan, and Policy G7 of the London Plan, and Policy N2 of the NPPF 2026.
- The proposed single-storey rear extension by reason of its excessive depth, height and position on the shared side boundary with No. 18 Cottesmore Avenue, Clayhall, Ilford, IG5 0TG, would result in detrimental harm to the amenity of occupies of this property by reason of its excessive dominance that would result in an unacceptable impact on the outlook, and increased sense of enclosure. Thus, the proposal would be contrary to Policies LP30 of the Redbridge Local Plan and the Housing Design Guide SPD.
- Redbridge Planning Service adopts a positive and proactive approach when engaging with applicants/agents in line with the National Planning Policy Framework. We encourage engagement with the pre-application service to avoid delays in the planning process. https://www.redbridge.gov.uk/planning-and-building/planning/ The proposal does not comply with policy and no pre-application discussions were entered into. The applicant is encouraged to seek pre-application advice prior to the submission of any future planning application.
- in accordance with plans NH-151-PL-01, PL-04, PL-05, PL-006, Design and Access Statement, Planning Statement, Reasonable Exception Statement, NH-151- Location Plan,
