Council planning record

Front canopy. (Summary).

345, Green Lane, SEVEN KINGS, Ilford, IG3 9TH

A decision on this application has been issued.Reference: 1779/26London Borough of Redbridge

Last published check: 4 Oct 2026, 10:06. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application location

345, Green Lane, SEVEN KINGS, Ilford, IG3 9TH

This record has no verified map location.

Application summary

Status
A decision on this application has been issued.
Application type
Full Planning Permission
Received
25 Jun 2026
Validated
22 Jul 2026
Determination deadline
15 Sept 2026
Local authority
London Borough of Redbridge

Application overview

Front canopy. (Summary).

Proposal details

Reference
1779/26
Alternative references
PLP-00004239
Ward
Goodmayes
Agent
Sodvadiya
UPRN
10023770943

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Documents 9 of 9

DocumentPublishedAction
applicationform1782398412432REDACTED.pdfApplication form8 Jul 2026View
cilform11782398417714.pdfCIL supporting document8 Jul 2026View
345GL01 Rev.A.pdfExisting plan8 Jul 2026View
345GL02 Rev.A.pdfProposed plan8 Jul 2026View
260714 345 Green Lane Reasonable Exception Statement.pdfFire statement21 Jul 2026View
BlockCombined plan21 Jul 2026View
345GL00 Rev.A.pdfSite/block plan22 Jul 2026View
2095242_Decision_Full_FULR.pdfDecision notice18 Sept 2026View
Green Lane.pdfOfficer report18 Sept 2026View

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Application date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  2. Received date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  3. Registration date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  4. Valid date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  5. Press notice start date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  6. Site notice date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  7. Publicity end date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  8. Consultation expiry date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  9. Site notice end date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  10. Statutory expiry date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  11. Decision due date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  12. Extension date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  13. Dispatch date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  14. Decision date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

Decision & conditions

Refuse Permission/Consent
2095242_Decision_Full_FULR.pdf
Planning conditions
  1. The application was assessed with the following plans / documents - 345GL(00) Rev A - Location Plan; 345GL(01) Rev A - Existing Floor Plan and Elevations; 345GL(02) Rev A - Proposed Floor Plan and Elevations; 345GL(03) Rev B - Existing and Proposed Block Plan; Fire Statement
  2. The proposed canopy would unacceptably impact pedestrian flow and create further accessibility issues along this stretch of Green Lane pavement, especially in combination with existing street furniture, contrary to Redbridge Local Plan Policies LP9 and LP22; London Plan Policies SD8, D8 and T2; and Policies DP3, TR1 and TR4 of the NPPF (2026).
  3. Redbridge Planning Service adopts a positive and proactive approach when engaging with applicants/agents in line with the National Planning Policy Framework. We encourage engagement with the pre-application service to avoid delays in the planning process. https://www.redbridge.gov.uk/planning-and-building/planning/ The proposal does not comply with policy and no pre-application discussions were entered into. The applicant is encouraged to seek pre-application advice prior to the submission of any future planning application.
  4. The proposal, by reason of its projection, prominence and non-subservient design, would result in additional visual clutter and fail to integrate effectively with the host shopfront, detrimental to the visual amenity of this parade and streetscene; the original character and pattern of development on Green Lane, contrary to Policies LP26 and LP28 of the Redbridge Local Plan; Policy D3 of the London Plan; and Policy DP3 of the NPPF (2026).
Related records

Understand this planning record

All planning guides
  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.