Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Single storey rear and part side extension. First floor rear/side extension. Alterations to fenestrations. (Summary)
Proposal details
- Reference
- 1611/26
- Alternative references
- PP-15011914
- Ward
- Newbury
- Agent
- Miah
- UPRN
- 100022237973
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 9 of 9
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| ApplicationFormRedacted.pdfApplication form | 16 Jun 2026 | View |
| SR-41 - Location Plan.pdfSite/block plan | 16 Jun 2026 | View |
| SR41 P101 Existing Plans Rev 2.pdfExisting plan | 30 Jun 2026 | View |
| SR41 P103 3D Views Rev 1.pdfPhotographs | 30 Jun 2026 | View |
| Design Access Planning Statement Rev 1.pdfDesign and access statement | 30 Jun 2026 | View |
| Reasonable_Exceptions_Statement_41_Stainforth_Road.pdfFire statement | 30 Jun 2026 | View |
| SR41 P102 Proposed Plans Rev 3.pdfProposed plan | 7 Jul 2026 | View |
| ApasTemplate_103580.pdfOfficer report | 7 Aug 2026 | View |
| 2087319_Decision_Full_Householder_FULR.pdfDecision notice | 7 Aug 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourcePublicity end date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
2087319_Decision_Full_Householder_FULR.pdfPlanning conditions
- in accordance with plans SR-41 - LOC, SR-41 - P101 (2), SR-41 - P102 (3), SR-41 - P103 (1), and Planning, Design & Access Statement.
- The proposed single storey rear extension by reason of its excessive depth; first floor rear extension by reason of its excessive width and gable roof design; and two storey side extension by reason of its excessive scale would be an intrusive and insubordinate additions, visually overbearing, out of scale and character with this and surrounding dwellings, as well as having an adverse effect on the visual amenities of the locality. Thus, the development would therefore be contrary to Policies LP26 and LP30 of the Local Plan, D3 of the London Plan, and the aims of the Housing Design Guidance SPD (2019).
- The proposed single storey rear extension by reason of its excessive depth along the boundary with neighbouring property No. 39 Stainforth Road, would represent an unneighbourly, intrusive and overbearing form of development. The extension would result in a significant adverse impact on the outlook, as well as the level of daylight and sunlight available to the occupiers of this neighbouring property. Consequently, the proposal would provide an unacceptable standard of residential amenity and would therefore fail to accord with Policies LP26 and LP30 of the Redbridge Local Plan, Policy D3 of the London Plan, and the objectives of the Housing Design Guidance SPD (2019).
- Redbridge Planning Service adopts a positive and proactive approach when engaging with applicants/agents in line with the National Planning Policy Framework. We encourage engagement with the pre-application service to avoid delays in the planning process. https://www.redbridge.gov.uk/planning-and-building/planning/ The proposal does not comply with policy and no pre-application discussions were entered into. The applicant is encouraged to seek pre-application advice prior to the submission of any future planning application.
