Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Double storey rear extension. (Summary)
Proposal details
- Reference
- 1140/26
- Alternative references
- PP-14888469
- Ward
- Newbury
- Agent
- Hussain
- UPRN
- 100023048970
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 5 of 5
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| ApplicationFormRedacted.pdfApplication form | 28 Apr 2026 | View |
| Fire Strategy.pdfFire statement | 29 Apr 2026 | View |
| Plans.pdfCombined plan | 21 May 2026 | View |
| 633951633949Decision Full FULR_855_v1.pdfDecision notice | 10 Jul 2026 | View |
| ApasTemplate_103088.pdfOfficer report | 10 Jul 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourcePublicity end date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
633951633949Decision Full FULR_855_v1.pdfPlanning conditions
- in accordance with plans 01 of 01, and Reasonable Exception Statement
- The details submitted with this application are insufficient because they fail to provide sufficient information, including a Noise Impact Assessment, regarding number of employees and visitors as a result of the material uplift of the floorspace and capacity of the building at the site. Thus, officers are unable to robustly determine whether the proposed development meets the aims of Policies LP24 and LP26 of the Local Plan and Policy D14 of the London Plan.
- The details submitted with this application are insufficient because they fail to provide any information about whether there would be sufficient space for a vehicle to turn around within the site with the proposed extension in place. Thus, officers are unable to robustly determine whether the proposed development meets the aims of Policies LP22 and LP26 of the Local Plan and Policies T2, T4 and T6 of the London Plan.
- Redbridge Planning Service adopts a positive and proactive approach when engaging with applicants/agents in line with the National Planning Policy Framework. We encourage engagement with the pre-application service to avoid delays in the planning process. https://www.redbridge.gov.uk/planning-and-building/planning/ The proposal does not comply with policy and no pre-application discussions were entered into. The applicant is encouraged to seek pre-application advice prior to the submission of any future planning application.
