Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Single storey ground floor rear extension and change of use of the ground floor rear commercial unit (Class E) to a dwelling (1x 2-bed flat) (class C3) with associated waste/refuse, cycle store and amenity space (summary)
Proposal details
- Reference
- 0844/26
- Alternative references
- PP-14810716
- Ward
- Newbury
- Agent
- Bashkal
- UPRN
- 100022193137
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 15 of 15
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| ApplicationFormRedacted.pdfApplication form | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| LocationPlan.pdfSite/block plan | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| Block Plan.pdfSite/block plan | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| base/groundExisting plan - floor plan | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| second/firstCombined plan - floor plan | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| front/rearExisting plan - elevation | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| base/groundProposed plan - floor plan | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| side/rearProposed plan - elevation | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| sectionCombined plan | 26 Mar 2026 | View |
| Design and Access Statement.pdfDesign and access statement | 13 May 2026 | View |
| Waste Management Plan.pdfSite waste management plan | 13 May 2026 | View |
| Reasonable Exemption Statement.pdfFire statement | 13 May 2026 | View |
| CIL Form.pdfCIL liability notice | 13 May 2026 | View |
| 20260714T160550.669251DN.pdfDecision notice | 14 Jul 2026 | View |
| 20260714T160156.591251ARSOR.pdfOfficer report | 14 Jul 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourcePublicity end date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
20260714T160550.669251DN.pdfPlanning conditions
- in accordance with plans 230203-P1, 230203-P2, 230203-P3, 230203-P4, 230203-P5, 230203-P6, Block Plan, Location Plan, Waste Management Plan, Design and Access Statement, Reasonable Exception Statement, and Unilateral Undertaking
- The two bedrooms as proposed, by virtue of their poor levels of outlook and access daylight/sunlight as well as the significant sense of enclosure, would result in substandard residential accommodation, to the detriment of the amenities of prospective occupants of the development. Thus, the proposal is contrary the Council's Housing Design Supplementary Planning Document, Policies LP26 and LP29 of the Local Plan, and Policy D6 of the London Plan.
- The details submitted with this application are insufficient because they fail to provide any supporting evidence (in the form of an Arboricultural Impact Assessment, Arboricultural Method Statement, Tree Survey Plan, and Tree Protection Plan) to demonstrate that the proposed single-storey rear extension would not have a severe and adverse impact on mature tree located in close proximity to the rear garden of the application site. Without this, the Council is unable to fully and robusely assess the application in terms of impact of trees, and the proposals cannot be considered to satisfy the requirements Policy LP38 of the Local Plan, Policy G7 of the London Plan, and Paragraph 187 of the NPPF (2024).
- Redbridge Planning Service adopts a positive and proactive approach when engaging with applicants/agents in line with the National Planning Policy Framework. We encourage engagement with the pre-application service to avoid delays in the planning process. https://www.redbridge.gov.uk/planning-and-building/planning/ The proposal does not comply with policy and no pre-application discussions were entered into. The applicant is encouraged to seek pre-application advice prior to the submission of any future planning application.
- In the absence of Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) information, the development will likely result in a net loss of biodiversity, which is contrary to Policy LP39 of the Local Plan and the NPPF.
- Notwithstanding the description of development and the details provided within the Design and Access Statement, and Waste Management Plan listed under condition 2 above, the details submitted with this application are insufficient because they fail to show how an accessible, dedicated refuse and recycling storage provision can be provided within the site, details without which this Council is unable to fully assess the application and without which the proposals cannot be considered to satisfy the requirements of Policy LP26 of the Council’s Local Plan.
