Council planning record

2no. Oak - Remove both trees & to replant with wildlife-friendly native tree. Trees regularly drop large branches, creating a risk of serious injury, acorns cause a slipping hazard. Trees have grown to a size that block a significant amount of light to the house & garden. Shading has contributed to dampness inside the property, Trees have clearly outgrown the available space in the garden. Their size & spread pose an ongoing risk to the property, neighbouring boundaries & safe use of the outdoor space.

5 BRUNEL CLOSE, HEDGE END, SOUTHAMPTON, SO30 2TA

Decided Refuse Tree Consent ForReference: T/25/99990Eastleigh Borough Council

Last published check: 13 Oct 2026, 19:00. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Date Received

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  2. Date Valid

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  3. Consultation Period Ends

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  4. Decision Date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  5. Statutory Decision Date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source

Application summary

Status
Decided Refuse Tree Consent For
Application type
Consent under Tree Preservation Orders
Received
28 Aug 2025
Validated
1 Sept 2025
Determination deadline
27 Oct 2025
Local authority
Eastleigh Borough Council

Application overview

2no. Oak - Remove both trees & to replant with wildlife-friendly native tree. Trees regularly drop large branches, creating a risk of serious injury, acorns cause a slipping hazard. Trees have grown to a size that block a significant amount of light to the house & garden. Shading has contributed to dampness inside the property, Trees have clearly outgrown the available space in the garden. Their size & spread pose an ongoing risk to the property, neighbouring boundaries & safe use of the outdoor space.

Proposal details

Reference
T/25/99990
Alternative references
14286053
Ward
Hedge End North Ward
Parish
Hedge End CP

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Application location

5 BRUNEL CLOSE, HEDGE END, SOUTHAMPTON, SO30 2TA

This record has no verified map location.

Documents 8 of 8

DocumentPublishedAction
T_25_99990 PL_Final DecisionDecision Notice · PDF17 Oct 2025View
Brunel Close 99990 AMOfficer Report · PDF15 Oct 2025View
ApplicationFormRedacted.pdfApplication Form · PDF28 Aug 2025View
IMG_9871.jpegPhotos28 Aug 2025View
IMG_9740.jpegPhotos28 Aug 2025View
IMG_9887.jpegPhotos28 Aug 2025View
IMG_9872.jpegLocation Plan28 Aug 2025View
IMG_9873.jpegPhotos28 Aug 2025View

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Decision & conditions

Refuse Tree Consent For
T_25_99990 PL_Final Decision
Planning conditions
  1. REFUSE PERMISSION: 2no. Oak - Remove both trees & to replant with wildlife-friendly native tree. REASONS FOR REFUSAL: 1. The application oaks are large, mature, native specimens capable of providing long-term benefit in terms of public, visual amenity. For this reason, justification for felling should be suitably evidenced. Branch shedding in mature trees is a natural process, one that can often be pre-empted by observing changes in the tree e.g. premature browning off of leaves or obviously dead branches (of which several were noted at the time of our inspection). The removal of dead branches is exempt from application and may be carried out at any time. Should you consider that the tree presents an unacceptable risk to people or property, you are strongly recommended to seek independent arboricultural advice e.g. from the Institute of Chartered Foresters (https://icf.datawareonline.co.uk/Directory-of-Consultants) or the Arboricultural Association (https://www.trees.org.uk/Registered-Consultant-Directory). 2. Seed-fall is not generally considered to be sufficient justification to fell significant amenity trees. It is an annual, natural occurrence which is part of life living amongst established trees. 3. It is accepted that the position of these large trees to the south of the building will cause large amounts of shade. It is also noted that the branch tips are close to the property. This situation can be improved by selective pruning to increase separation from the building and by crownlifting over the gardens. This will not provide complete relief but will improve the current situation, without requiring either tree be felled. An acceptable specification for this will be stated below and but you will need to make a further application before carrying out this work.
  2. INFORMATIVES: 1. The removal of dead branches is exempt from application and may be carried out at any time. 2. The severance of ivy does not require an application. 3. The following work will be acceptable, subject to a further application being made: 2no. Oak – Selectively prune both trees to provide 3m separation from the house. Crownlift both trees to 5m above ground level.
Related records

No related records were published in this section.

Understand this planning record

All planning guides
  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.