Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
1no. Birch (T1, on boundary with No. 63) - Fell to as close to ground level as possible. Reason - The tree has seemingly outgrown its current position & roots are now raising driveways on properties either side. 1no. Conifer (T2) - Fell to ground level. Reason - Poor historical planting location, tree is now competing with adjacent tree. Removal would allow chance of remaining tree to achieve full potential.
Proposal details
- Reference
- T/25/100036
- Alternative references
- 14308982
- Ward
- West End South Ward
- Parish
- West End CP
- Agent
- Shawyers (Fred Lamb)
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsApplication location
61 ULLSWATER AVENUE, WEST END, SOUTHAMPTON, SO18 3QS
This record has no verified map location.
Documents 9 of 9
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Appeal Decision NoticeAppeal Decision · PDF | 20 Jul 2026 | View |
| TPO appeal questionnaire and docs zip fileAppeal | 12 Mar 2026 | View |
| Appeal Form _RedactedAppeal · PDF | 26 Nov 2025 | View |
| Arborist Report 61 Ullswater Avenue West EndAppeal · PDF | 26 Nov 2025 | View |
| T_25_100036 PL_Final DecisionDecision Notice · PDF | 29 Oct 2025 | View |
| 61Ullswater100036AMOfficer Report · PDF | 28 Oct 2025 | View |
| Arborist Report 61 Ullswater Avenue West End.pdfReport - Other · PDF | 5 Sept 2025 | View |
| ApplicationFormRedacted.pdfApplication Form · PDF | 5 Sept 2025 | View |
| QU9901 Wright.jpgLocation Plan | 5 Sept 2025 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Decision & conditions
Appeal Decision Notice T_25_100036 PL_Final DecisionPlanning conditions
- REFUSE: T1 - Birch – Fell REASONS FOR REFUSAL: 1. The application Birch (T1) is a medium-sized tree growing within an informal group of the same species. It is visually healthy. It is clearly visible to the public from the roadside and offers benefit in terms of public, visual amenity. For these reasons, justification to fell such a tree must be compelling; 2. Tree has outgrown its position: The felling of the tree for this reason would be a disproportionate response. The tree is in close proximity to the building and selective pruning to provide reasonable clearance is clearly necessary. Such pruning would not be expected to impact to visual appearance of the tree nor significantly affect its health. 3. Tree has caused damage to driveways: Whilst the Council acknowledges that surfacing surrounding the tree has become deformed, no evidence has been supplied to confirm that root pruning is not a reasonable solution. Such evidence may include a photographic record of the blocks lifted and the roots beneath exposed, measured and the implications of their pruning evaluated.
- CONSENT TO: 1no. Conifer (T2) - Fell to ground level.
Related records
Related records could not be loaded.
