Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
1 no. Oak (T1)- Crown raise up to 6m above ground level, by removing secondary and tertiary branches only, reduce canopy all over by up to 1.5m to leave a natural crown shape. All with a maximum live pruning wound of 45mm. Reason - To maintain the tree's size for its location, to reduce shade, bird and leaf litter. To allow the canopy to thrive but to reduce encroachment onto property and dwellings.
Proposal details
- Reference
- T/23/95951
- Alternative references
- 12436586
- Ward
- Hedge End South Ward
- Parish
- Hedge End CP
- Agent
- Paul Freeman Tree Services (Mr Paul Freeman)
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 4 of 4
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| T_23_95951 PL_Final DecisionDecision Notice · PDF | 27 Oct 2023 | View |
| Officer Report SK95951Officer Report · PDF | 25 Oct 2023 | View |
| 3DD367F9-EE1A-4629-8575-CC157E13A353.jpegLocation Plan | 7 Sept 2023 | View |
| ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf · PDF | 7 Sept 2023 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation Period Ends
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory Decision Date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
T_23_95951 PL_Final DecisionPlanning conditions
- REFUSE: 1 no. Oak (T1)- Crown raise up to 6m above ground level, by removing secondary and tertiary branches only, reduce canopy all over by up to 1.5m
- Reason: The proposed work is considered unjustified and will be of detriment to the health and appearance of the tree. The works would thus result in an adverse impact upon the visual amenity, ecology and wildlife and screening of the surrounding area.
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
