Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
1 no. Oak (T1)- Branch reduction between approximately 1.5m-3m to alleviate end weight, wind sail, and leverage on selected elongated lateral limbs. All cuts back to a suitable growth point and worked to BS3998. Due to the growth of the tree, and not completing a full crown reduction the length of branch reduction will vary, for a better understanding of proposed pruning points please see the attached photos.
Proposal details
- Reference
- T/23/95214
- Alternative references
- 12155847
- Ward
- Hiltingbury Ward
- Parish
- Chandler's Ford CP
- Agent
- Mr Ross Man
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 6 of 6
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| T_23_95214 PL_Final DecisionDecision Notice · PDF | 3 Jul 2023 | View |
| Officer Report CH95214Officer Report · PDF | 28 Jun 2023 | View |
| Screenshot_20230512_103259_Photo Editor.jpgPhotos | 12 May 2023 | View |
| Screenshot_20230512_103433_Gallery.jpgPhotos | 12 May 2023 | View |
| Screenshot_20230512_102117_Maps.jpgLocation Plan | 12 May 2023 | View |
| ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf · PDF | 12 May 2023 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation Period Ends
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory Decision Date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
T_23_95214 PL_Final DecisionPlanning conditions
- REFUSE: 1 no. Oak (T1)- Branch reduction between approximately 1.5m-3m
- Reason: The proposed work is considered unjustified and will be of detriment to the health and appearance of the tree. The works would thus result in an adverse impact upon the visual amenity, ecology and wildlife and screening of the surrounding area.
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
