Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
First floor extension over the existing garage space. Addition of gable end to roof facing road. New porch. Conversion of the existing garage to habitable space(Resubmission H/22/94350)
Proposal details
- Reference
- H/23/95537
- Alternative references
- 12280329
- Ward
- Hiltingbury Ward
- Parish
- Chandler's Ford CP
- Agent
- Unsted Design Ltd (Mr Michael Unsted)
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 12 of 12
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| H_23_95537 PL_Final DecisionDecision Notice · PDF | 18 Aug 2023 | View |
| Officer ReportOfficer Report · PDF | 17 Aug 2023 | View |
| SW ResponseConsultation Response · PDF | 14 Aug 2023 | View |
| GIS · PDF | 14 Aug 2023 | View |
| Ecology response for H 23 95537 10 MERDON AVENUE, CHANDLER'S FORDConsultee Response · PDF | 31 Jul 2023 | View |
| Location PlanLocation Plan · PDF | 30 Jun 2023 | View |
| 3D ViewsIllustration · PDF | 30 Jun 2023 | View |
| Application Form RedactedApplication Form · PDF | 30 Jun 2023 | View |
| Planning StatementPlanning Statement · PDF | 30 Jun 2023 | View |
| Proposed Elevation and Floor PlansElevations And Floor Plan · PDF | 30 Jun 2023 | View |
| Site PlanSite Layout Plan · PDF | 30 Jun 2023 | View |
| Existing Elevation and Floor PlansElevations And Floor Plan · PDF | 30 Jun 2023 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation Period Ends
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory Decision Date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
H_23_95537 PL_Final DecisionPlanning conditions
- The proposed development due to its design, massing, and detailing would create an unattractive and incongruous feature detrimental to the character and appearance of the existing chalet bungalow and wider street scene. As such the proposed development is contrary to Policy DM1 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016-2036, Provisions within the National Planning Policy Framework and the Council's Quality Places Supplementary Planning Document.
- Note to Applicant: In accordance with paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework (July 2021), Eastleigh Borough Council takes a positive approach to the handling of development proposals so as to achieve, whenever possible, a positive outcome and to ensure all proposals are dealt with in a timely manner. In this instance the application has been refused as it is contrary to the relevant policies of the Local Plan and the planning harm was unable to be resolved in a timely manner.
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
