Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Replace existing external boundary wall with fence on both side (Oakwood Road and Hiltingbury Road), dropped kerb, erect driveway gate and pedestrian gate (Amended H/22/93248) (Retrospective application)
Proposal details
- Reference
- H/23/95072
- Ward
- Hiltingbury Ward
- Parish
- Chandler's Ford CP
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 11 of 11
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| H_23_95072 Delegated Officer ReportOfficer Report · PDF | 6 Sept 2023 | View |
| H_23_95072 PL_Final DecisionDecision Notice · PDF | 6 Sept 2023 | View |
| Ecology response amended for H 23 95072 1 OAKWOOD ROAD, CHANDLER'S FORDConsultee Response · PDF | 21 Aug 2023 | View |
| Tree OfficerConsultation Response · PDF | 9 Aug 2023 | View |
| Hampshire HighwaysConsultation Response · PDF | 1 Aug 2023 | View |
| Ecology response for H 23 95072 1 OAKWOOD ROAD, CHANDLER'S FORDConsultee Response · PDF | 25 Jul 2023 | View |
| Site Plan · PDF | 15 May 2023 | View |
| Fence ElevationElevations Plan · PDF | 18 Apr 2023 | View |
| Application Form RedactedApplication Form · PDF | 18 Apr 2023 | View |
| Site PlansSite Layout Plan · PDF | 18 Apr 2023 | View |
| Location PlanLocation Plan · PDF | 21 Sept 2022 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation Period Ends
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory Decision Date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
H_23_95072 PL_Final DecisionPlanning conditions
- The proposal would create an incongruous feature at odds with the appearance of and detrimental to the character and pattern of development within the locality. It would, therefore, be contrary to Policy DM1 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan (2016-2036).
- The vehicular gates on plan (referenced 02) are not adequately set back from the edge of the highway. Vehicular gates must be set back off the highway to a minimum of 6 metres. As such the proposed vehicular gates pose a highway safety risk, at odds with policy DM13 of the Eastleigh Local Plan (2016-2036), against the general advice of Hampshire Highways and the provisions of the NPPF (2021).
- Insufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that there would be no adverse impact upon the existing protected trees on site. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policy DM1 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan (2016-2036), the Trees and Development SPD (2021) and the provisions of the NPPF (2021).
- Note to Applicant: The application was refused following the assessment of the following plans: LOC 01, 01 and 02. In accordance with paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2021), Eastleigh Borough Council takes a positive approach to the handling of development proposals so as to achieve, whenever possible, a positive outcome and to ensure all proposals are dealt with in a timely manner.
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
