Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Construction of garage, relocating existing entrance from Oakhill Close to Dodwell Lane and reduce front fence height
Proposal details
- Reference
- H/22/93147
- Alternative references
- 11288768
- Ward
- Bursledon & Hound North Ward
- Parish
- Bursledon CP
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 11 of 11
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| H_22_93147 PL_Final Decision · PDF | 13 Sept 2022 | View |
| H_22_93147 Delegated Officer ReportOfficer Report · PDF | 12 Sept 2022 | View |
| Neighbours Comment RedactedNeighbour Correspondence · PDF | 9 Sept 2022 | View |
| Southern Water GISConsultation Response · PDF | 11 Aug 2022 | View |
| Southern WaterConsultation Response · PDF | 11 Aug 2022 | View |
| Hampshire HighwaysConsultation Response · PDF | 9 Aug 2022 | View |
| Existing and Proposed Site Plans and ElevationsPlans · PDF | 19 Jul 2022 | View |
| Garage First Floor PlanFloor Plan · PDF | 11 Jul 2022 | View |
| Garage Elevations and Floor PlanElevations And Floor Plan · PDF | 29 Jun 2022 | View |
| Access StatementDesign And Access Statement · PDF | 30 May 2022 | View |
| Application FormApplication Form · PDF | 30 May 2022 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation Period Ends
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory Decision Date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
H_22_93147 PL_Final DecisionPlanning conditions
- The proposed detached double garage, by virtue of its size, scale and height would be excessive for the space available and inappropriate in its proximity to and relationship with the neighbouring bungalow and application dwelling, resulting in an unacceptably cramped form of development to the detriment of the visual amenity and character of the street scene and character of the area. As such, the application is considered to be contrary to the requirements of Policy DM1 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016-2036 and the Council’s ‘Quality Places’ Supplementary Planning Document.
- Note to Applicant: The application was refused following the assessment of the following plans: LOC 01, 01, 02 & 03. In accordance with paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework (February 2019), Eastleigh Borough Council takes a positive approach to the handling of development proposals so as to achieve, whenever possible, a positive outcome and to ensure all proposals are dealt with in a timely manner.
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
