Council planning record

Erection of 1.no 2-bedroom dwelling and sever land from 5 Fryern Close

5 FRYERN CLOSE, CHANDLER'S FORD, EASTLEIGH, SO53 2LF

Decided Refuse Planning Permission ForReference: F/25/99379Eastleigh Borough Council

Last published check: 22 Sept 2026, 03:21. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Date Received

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  2. Date Valid

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  3. Consultation Period Ends

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  4. Decision Date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  5. Statutory Decision Date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source

Application summary

Status
Decided Refuse Planning Permission For
Application type
Full planning
Received
14 May 2025
Validated
15 May 2025
Determination deadline
10 Jul 2025
Local authority
Eastleigh Borough Council

Application overview

Erection of 1.no 2-bedroom dwelling and sever land from 5 Fryern Close

Proposal details

Reference
F/25/99379
Alternative references
email (F/25/99073)
Ward
Chandler's Ford Ward
Parish
Chandler's Ford CP
Agent
HRP Architects (Mr Mark Holman)

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Application location

5 FRYERN CLOSE, CHANDLER'S FORD, EASTLEIGH, SO53 2LF

This record has no verified map location.

Documents 15 of 15

DocumentPublishedAction
Delegated Officer ReportOfficer Report · PDF17 Jun 2025View
Decision NoticeDecision Notice · PDF17 Jun 2025View
Natural England .Consultation Response · PDF3 Jun 2025View
HCC HighwaysConsultation Response · PDF3 Jun 2025View
Habitat Regulations Assessment - 5 Fryern Close3 Jun 2025View
EcologyConsultee Response · PDF2 Jun 2025View
Updated Nutrient_Calculator_Itchen_SAC_V_03_01_3Supporting Documents22 May 2025View
Habitat Regulations Assessment - 5 Fryern CloseOfficer Report22 May 2025View
Wild Capital - BNG Buyers FAQsSupporting Documents · PDF15 May 2025View
Proposed PlansPlans · PDF15 May 2025View
Proposed ElevationsPlans · PDF14 May 2025View
Existing Site, Location, Floor and Elevation PlansPlans · PDF14 May 2025View
Application Form Redacted (7)Application Form · PDF14 May 2025View
Design statement (1)Design And Access Statement · PDF14 May 2025View
Proposed Site and Floor PlansPlans · PDF14 May 2025View

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Decision & conditions

Refuse Planning Permission For
Decision Notice
Planning conditions
  1. The proposed development, by virtue of the introduction of an additional attached dwelling to form a terrace of three, would be out of keeping with the established character of Fryern Close, which is defined by two-storey semi-detached pairs of dwellings. The proposed dwelling would disrupt the consistent and coherent pattern of development in the area and, due to its greater width, would appear visually dominant and incongruous within the street scene. The proposal would fail to respect the prevailing character and appearance of the surrounding built environment and does not take full and proper account of the site context. As such, the development is contrary to Policy DM1 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan (2016–2036).
  2. The proposed development, by reason of its siting and the positioning of upper floor windows facing towards the rear elevation and garden of 4 Fryern Close, would result in a greater degree of overlooking and a harmful loss of privacy. The increased views into the private outdoor space would diminish the amenity and enjoyment of that space for existing occupants. As such, the development would have an unacceptable impact on the residential amenities of neighbouring occupiers, contrary to Policy DM1 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan (2016–2036).
  3. The application fails to provide for the required mitigation to offset the impacts of the development on the European protected Solent Complex (SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites) and New Forest SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites, from additional recreational pressure and nutrient loading generated by the population increase and additional sewage resulting from the development. The application is therefore contrary to the requirements of Policy DM11 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan (2016-2036), Paragraphs 180 and 186 of the National Planning Policy Framework, and the provisions of The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017.
  4. The application fails to demonstrate that the proposed development would adequately protect or conserve existing biodiversity interests on the site. In the absence of sufficient ecological information and mitigation measures, the proposal fails to comply with Policy DM11 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan (2016–2036), which seeks to protect, conserve and enhance biodiversity and ensure no net loss of ecological value.
  5. The application fails to demonstrate compliance with the statutory requirement as set out in the Environment Act 2021 and associated regulations, to deliver 10% Biodiversity Net Gain. The submitted information is incomplete and does not meet national validation standards. Key details necessary to assess the baseline habitat value, proposed habitat enhancements, and overall biodiversity outcomes are either missing or insufficient. As a result, the application does not provide adequate evidence that the intended purchase of off-site credits will achieve the necessary measurable net gain in biodiversity, contrary to policy DM11 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016–2036 or the requirements of the Environment Act 2021.
  6. Note to Applicant: In accordance with paragraph 39 of the National Planning Policy Framework (December 2024), Eastleigh Borough Council takes a positive approach to the handling of development proposals so as to achieve, whenever possible, a positive outcome and to ensure all proposals are dealt with in a timely manner. In this instance the application has been refused as it is contrary to the relevant policies of the Local Plan and the planning harm was unable to be resolved in a timely manner.
Related records

No related records were published in this section.

Understand this planning record

All planning guides
  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.