Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Erection of replacement dwelling.
Proposal details
- Reference
- F/23/94651
- Alternative references
- 11902673
- Ward
- Bursledon & Hound North Ward
- Parish
- Bursledon CP
- Agent
- Vivid Design Studio Ltd (Mr Philip Dudley)
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 14 of 14
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Delegated Officer ReportOfficer Report · PDF | 30 Mar 2023 | View |
| F_23_94651 PL_Final Decision · PDF | 30 Mar 2023 | View |
| Ecology response for F 23 94651 DERRY DACY, PEEWIT HILL, BURSLEDON, SOUTHAMPTON, SO31 8BLConsultee Response · PDF | 16 Mar 2023 | View |
| ParishConsultation Response · PDF | 9 Mar 2023 | View |
| HCC Response_F-23-94651Consultation Response · PDF | 22 Feb 2023 | View |
| ApplicationFormRedacted.pdfApplication Form · PDF | 2 Feb 2023 | View |
| Proposed ElevationsElevations And Floor Plan · PDF | 2 Feb 2023 | View |
| Block planBlock Plan · PDF | 2 Feb 2023 | View |
| Site location planLocation Plan · PDF | 2 Feb 2023 | View |
| Existing Elevations and Floor PlansElevations And Floor Plan · PDF | 2 Feb 2023 | View |
| Proposed drainage planDrainage Plan · PDF | 2 Feb 2023 | View |
| Proposed site planSite Layout Plan · PDF | 2 Feb 2023 | View |
| Ecology ReportEcological Assessment · PDF | 2 Feb 2023 | View |
| Proposed Floor PlansFloor Plan · PDF | 2 Feb 2023 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation Period Ends
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory Decision Date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
F_23_94651 PL_Final DecisionPlanning conditions
- The proposal, owing to the combination of the excessive massing, scale and size of the replacement dwelling would result in an unduly prominent and visually obtrusive form of development which would have an unacceptably urbanising and increased physical and visual impact upon this area of designated countryside, to the detriment of its prevailing character. The application is therefore contrary to Policies S5, DM1 and DM26 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016-2036
- Insufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that the proposed development will not cause adverse harm to the biodiversity interests of the site and species, including bats and reptiles which are protected by virtue of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981) (as amended) and the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations (2017) (as amended). The proposals are therefore contrary to Policy DM11 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016-2036.
- Insufficient information has been provided to demonstrate a Biodiversity Net Gain and as such is contrary to Policy DM11 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016-2036
- Note to Applicant: The application was refused following the assessment of the following plans: 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16. In accordance with paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework (February 2019), Eastleigh Borough Council takes a positive approach to the handling of development proposals so as to achieve, whenever possible, a positive outcome and to ensure all proposals are dealt with in a timely manner.
Related records
No related records were published in this section.
