Council planning record

Construction of 3no. two bedroom terraced dwellings with ancillary amenity space and parking, following demolition of existing disused buildings

20A HIGH STREET, BOTLEY, SOUTHAMPTON, SO30 2EA

Decided Refuse Planning Permission ForReference: F/22/94436Eastleigh Borough Council

Last published check: 8 Oct 2026, 00:55. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application location

20A HIGH STREET, BOTLEY, SOUTHAMPTON, SO30 2EA

This record has no verified map location.

Application summary

Status
Decided Refuse Planning Permission For
Application type
Full planning
Received
28 Dec 2022
Validated
17 Apr 2023
Determination deadline
12 Jun 2023
Local authority
Eastleigh Borough Council

Application overview

Construction of 3no. two bedroom terraced dwellings with ancillary amenity space and parking, following demolition of existing disused buildings

Proposal details

Reference
F/22/94436
Alternative references
11729443
Ward
Botley Ward
Parish
Botley CP
Agent
Mr David Barton

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Documents 22 of 22

DocumentPublishedAction
F_22_94436 PL_Final DecisionDecision Notice · PDF12 Jun 2023View
F_22_94436 Delegated Officer ReportOfficer Report · PDF8 Jun 2023View
Trees - 20a High StreetConsultee Response · PDF15 May 2023View
Heritage - 20a High StreetConsultee Response · PDF9 May 2023View
Ecology response for F 22 94436 20A HIGH STREET, BOTLEYConsultee Response · PDF9 May 2023View
Urban Design - 20a High StreetConsultee Response · PDF9 May 2023View
Hampshire HighwaysConsultee Response · PDF4 May 2023View
Botley Parish - 20a High StreetParish Response · PDF3 May 2023View
Preliminary ecological appraisal (Internal /External Bat Survey)Ecological Assessment · PDF17 Apr 2023View
Land Contamination StudyReport - Con Land · PDF9 Mar 2023View
Arboricultural Impact Assessment & Method StatementSupporting Documents · PDF27 Feb 2023View
Tree Protection Plan & Arboricultural Method StatementSupporting Documents · PDF27 Feb 2023View
Pollution Control F 22 94436 20A High Street Botley Southampton SO30 2EAConsultee Response · PDF10 Jan 2023View
Location and Site PlansPlans · PDF6 Jan 2023View
Tree Constraints PlanSupporting Info · PDF6 Jan 2023View
Site Layout PlanSite Layout Plan · PDF6 Jan 2023View
Proposed Elevation PlansElevations Plan · PDF6 Jan 2023View
Proposed Ground and First Floor PlansPlans · PDF28 Dec 2022View
Elevation PlansElevations Plan · PDF28 Dec 2022View
Design and Access StatementDesign And Access Statement28 Dec 2022View
Application Form RedactedApplication Form · PDF28 Dec 2022View
Proposed Section and Details PlansPlans · PDF28 Dec 2022View

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Date Received

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  2. Date Valid

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  3. Consultation Period Ends

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  4. Decision Date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  5. Statutory Decision Date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source

Decision & conditions

Refuse Planning Permission For
F_22_94436 PL_Final Decision
Planning conditions
  1. The proposed development, by virtue of its layout, form, scale, design, appearance and quantum of development would result in an unacceptable overdevelopment of the application site which fails to take sufficient account of the site constraints, surrounding context and Conservation Area, to the detriment of neighbouring occupiers and uses, as well as the character and appearance of the Botley Conservation Area. As such the application is considered to be contrary to Policies DM1 & DM12 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan (2016-2036) and the Council's 'Quality Places' Supplementary Planning Document.
  2. The orientation and proximity of the proposed development in relation to existing properties would result in an unacceptable loss of privacy between Nos.18 to 20a High Street and No.5 Warner Mews, to the detriment of the amenity of occupiers of both the existing and proposed properties. As such the application is considered to be contrary to Policy DM1 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan (2016-2036) and the Council's 'Quality Places' Supplementary Planning Document.
  3. The proposed development fails to provide adequate off-road parking provision for both the existing and proposed development, or give sufficient detail as to how the development would be serviced, which would likely lead to further parking issues in the local area to the detriment of the amenity of existing surrounding uses and residents. As such the application is considered to be contrary to Policies DM1 & DM14 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan (2016-2036), as well as the Council's 'Quality Places' and 'Residential Parking Standards' Supplementary Planning Documents.
  4. The layout and design of the development, by virtue of the small north facing gardens and additional shading of the adjacent Horse Chestnut tree would result in a poor quality external living environment for future occupiers of the development, to the detriment of the residential amenity of these occupiers. As such the application is considered to be contrary to Policy DM1 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan (2016-2036) and the Council's 'Quality Places' Supplementary Planning Document.
  5. The application has not suitably demonstrated that the position of the residential units in relation to the adjacent Horse Chestnut tree will not result in continuing post-development impacts on the tree through pressure to adversely prune or remove branches, to the detriment of the health of the tree and the visual amenity and character of the Botley Conservation Area. As such the application is considered to be contrary to Policies DM1 & DM12 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan (2016-2036), as well as the Council's ‘Trees and Development’ and 'Quality Places' Supplementary Planning Documents.
  6. The application fails to provide the required mitigation to offset the impacts of the development upon the European protected Solent Complex (SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites), River Itchen (SAC) and New Forest National Park (SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites) from additional recreational pressure and nitrogen loading generated by the population increase and additional sewage resulting from the development. The proposal is therefore contrary to the requirements of Policy DM11 of the Eastleigh Borough Local Plan 2016-2036, the provisions of the NPPF (2021) and the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017.
  7. Note to Applicant: The application was refused following the assessment of the following plans: P/0322/3/E, P/0322/3/1, P/0322/3/2, P/0322/3/3, P/0322/3/4 & P/0322. In accordance with paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework (February 2019), Eastleigh Borough Council takes a positive approach to the handling of development proposals so as to achieve, whenever possible, a positive outcome and to ensure all proposals are dealt with in a timely manner.
Related records

No related records were published in this section.

Understand this planning record

All planning guides
  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.