Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Erection of single storey side/rear extension and new lift shaft. Replace existing rear dormer with larger dormer (part retrospective)
Proposal details
- Reference
- P26/0499
- Alternative references
- PP-14878781
- Development type
- Extension / Alteration
- Ward
- Netherton & Holly Hall
- Agent
- BHARJ
- UPRN
- 90156174
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 8 of 8
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Location & Site Plan Drg No. 26.864 P01 (A3)DCLOCPLN | 15 Jun 2026 | View |
| Existing Floor Plans Drg No. 26.864 P02 REV (A3)DCFLOPLN | 15 Jun 2026 | View |
| Existing Elevations Drg No. 26.864 P03 Rev (A3)DCELEVAT | 15 Jun 2026 | View |
| Proposed Floor Plans Drg No. 26.864 P04 Rev (A3)DCFLOPLN | 15 Jun 2026 | View |
| Proposed Elevations Drg No. 26.864 P05 Rev (A3)DCELEVAT | 15 Jun 2026 | View |
| Design & Access StatementDCDESACC | 15 Jun 2026 | View |
| Decision NoticeDCDECIS | 12 Aug 2026 | View |
| Officer ReportDCGENDOC | 12 Aug 2026 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Consultation expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceStatutory expiry date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceSite notice end date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Decision NoticePlanning conditions
- The proposed three-storey lift shaft and the enlargement of the rear dormer, by virtue of the low-quality design and its scale, would result in an incongruous addition to the existing building which would cause harm to the character and appearance of the existing building and the surrounding area. The scheme would therefore fail to accord with the guidance contained within the National Planning Policy Framework (2024) and the relevant requirements of Policies DLP4 and DLP39 of the Dudley Local Plan (2026). Refusal Statement Informative: The Local Planning Authority is aware of the requirement of paragraph 39 of the National Planning Policy Framework to work with the applicant in a positive, proactive and creative manner, seeking solutions to problems arising in relation to dealing with the application. In this case, after careful balanced consideration the LPA/Officers considers that there are insurmountable technical issues relating to the principle of this development and the impact on the wider area that have not been satisfactorily resolved to demonstrate that the scheme would result in the creation of a sustainable form of development and thereby failing to improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area.
