Council planning record

Prune back branches from 1 no. Sycamore overhanging into garden of 5 The Plantation by 3m.

36, HIGH STREET, PENSNETT, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 4RS

Decision madeReference: P26/0357Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

Last published check: 2 Oct 2026, 10:02. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application location

36, HIGH STREET, PENSNETT, BRIERLEY HILL, DY5 4RS

This record has no verified map location.

Application summary

Status
Decision made
Application type
Tree Preservation Order
Received
27 Mar 2026
Validated
Not published
Determination deadline
22 May 2026
Local authority
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council

Application overview

Prune back branches from 1 no. Sycamore overhanging into garden of 5 The Plantation by 3m.

Proposal details

Reference
P26/0357
Alternative references
PP-14816124
Ward
Brockmoor & Pensnett
Agent
Keay
UPRN
90089739

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Documents 4 of 4

DocumentPublishedAction
Sketch planDCGENPLN27 Mar 2026View
Tree application formTREEAPP10 Apr 2026View
Decision noticeDCDECIS26 Jun 2026View
Officer reportDCGENDOC26 Jun 2026View

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Application date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  2. Received date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  3. Registration date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  4. Decision due date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source
  5. Dispatch date

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  6. Decision date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

Decision & conditions

Refused
Decision notice
Planning conditions
  1. The reason given for the works is to reduce general encroachment into a neighbouring garden. While this is acknowledged, it does not in itself justify the level of intervention proposed. The application does not demonstrate that the extent of pruning is necessary to address a specific or actionable harm (e.g. structural damage or safety risk). As such, the proposal fails the test of proportionality.
Related records

Understand this planning record

All planning guides
  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.