PlanningTrack
Get started

Council planning record

Erection of 1no. Drive-Thru unit (Use Class E(b)/Sui Generis) together with the provision of a Drive Thru Lane, reconfiguration of the parking arrangement and associated landscaping

Land adjacent Newhall Inn Public House and Adjoining Car Par, Cannock, WS11 8NL

Decision made 19 Sep 2024 Full- Refusal. Full Planning Committee.Reference: CH/24/094Cannock Chase District Council

Last published check: 3 Oct 2026, 04:05. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application location

Land adjacent Newhall Inn Public House and Adjoining Car Par, Cannock, WS11 8NL

This record has no verified map location.

Application summary

Status
Decision made 19 Sep 2024 Full- Refusal. Full Planning Committee.
Application type
Full Planning Application
Received
28 Mar 2024
Validated
18 Jul 2024
Determination deadline
4 Sept 2024
Local authority
Cannock Chase District Council

Application overview

Erection of 1no. Drive-Thru unit (Use Class E(b)/Sui Generis) together with the provision of a Drive Thru Lane, reconfiguration of the parking arrangement and associated landscaping

Proposal details

Reference
CH/24/094
Ward
Hawks Green
Parish
Heath Hayes and Wimblebury CP
Agent
James Hodgkins
UPRN
MAN000000000120307

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Documents 68 of 68

DocumentPublishedAction
Refused 19.9.24 - Noise Impact Assessment - redactedPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Tree SurveyPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Transport StatementPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Soft Landscape Proposal PlanPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Heritage StatementPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Design and Access StatementPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Site Location and Block PlanPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Proposed Site PlanPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Proposed Building PlanPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Proposed Elevation PlansPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Proposed Roof PlansPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Hard Landscaping PlanPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Preliminary Ecological Appraisal ReportPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Planning StatementPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Bat Survey ReportPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Landscape and Visual Impact AppraisalPREFDWG3 Apr 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Existing Site PlanPREFDWG5 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO15 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO15 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO15 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO15 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO15 Apr 2024View
Heath Hayes & Wimblebury PC commentsPCONSULT15 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO15 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO16 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO16 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO16 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO18 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO19 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO19 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO19 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO22 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO22 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO22 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO22 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO22 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO22 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO22 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO22 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO25 Apr 2024View
Economic Development commentsPCONSULT30 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO30 Apr 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO30 Apr 2024View
Further objection receivedPNEIGHCO1 May 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO1 May 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO1 May 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO1 May 2024View
Objection receivedPNEIGHCO1 May 2024View
Staffordshire Police commentsPCONSULT2 May 2024View
Parks & Open Spaces commentsPCONSULT2 May 2024View
SCC Highways commentsPCONSULT2 May 2024View
Further objection receivedPNEIGHCO3 May 2024View
Environmental Health commentsPCONSULT3 May 2024View
Policy commentsPCONSULT15 May 2024View
Heritage/Conservation advicePCONSULT23 May 2024View
Application Form - without personal informationPAPPFRM10 Jul 2024View
Supporting info to address comments receivedPSUPINFO11 Jul 2024View
Refused 19.9.24 - Proposed site levels planPREFDWG15 Jul 2024View
Notice served under article 13PADDINFO19 Jul 2024View
Economic Development further commentsPCONSULT8 Aug 2024View
Environmental Health further commentsPCONSULT8 Aug 2024View
Parks & Open Spaces further commentsPCONSULT20 Aug 2024View
SCC Highways further commentsPCONSULT2 Sept 2024View
Officer ReportPOFFREP9 Sept 2024View
Decision NoticePDECNOT19 Sept 2024View
Further Objection ReceivedPNEIGHCO8 Oct 2024View
Further Objection ReceivedPNEIGHCO8 Oct 2024View
Police commentsPCONSULT15 Oct 2024View

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Received date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

  2. Application date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

  3. Press notice start date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

  4. Site notice date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

  5. Registration date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

  6. Valid date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

  7. Publicity end date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source

  8. Site notice end date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source

  9. Decision due date

    Past published deadline

    A published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.

    Council source

  10. Dispatch date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

  11. Decision date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

Decision & conditions

Full- Refusal
Decision Notice
Planning conditions
  1. 1. The proposal includes the loss of part of Cannock Chase Green Space Network. The benefits of the scheme provided by the applicant do not outweigh the loss of the Green Space Network and no alternative green space has been provided to compensate for this loss. Therefore, the proposal would be contrary to Policy CP5 of the Local Plan and as such would not be acceptable in principle. 2. It has been identified that the proposal would result in less than substantial harm to the Grade II Listed Building due to the loss of the Green Space Network. In this instance, the wider public benefits associated with the proposal do not outweigh the less than substantial harm the proposal would cause and therefore the proposal fails to have regard to the provisions of Section 66 of Planning (Listed Building and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and is contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework and Policy CP15 of the Cannock Chase Local Plan. 3. The application site sits on higher ground than the adjacent dwellings within Salisbury Drive located to the rear (north) of the application site. The siting of the proposed building with serving hatch and drive-thru lane would remain in an elevated position to these neighbouring dwellings and would result in an unacceptable loss of privacy and outlook for these occupiers. Whilst there is an established landscape strip that would act to some degree as a buffer to these adjacent dwelling, there are some gaps that allow views through, and the level of screening would significantly be reduced in the winter months when the trees lose their leaves. As such the proposed development would not accord with requirements of Policy CP3 of the Cannock Chase Local Plan and paragraphs 135 and of the NPPF 4. Insufficient information has been provided in respect of potential noise and disturbance arising from the proposal. The potential increased activity at the site in respect of comings and goings, vehicle activity and associated noise and pollution, in this residential location has the potential to have a detrimental impact upon the amenity of neighbouring occupiers and the wider locality. The development proposal is therefore in conflict with Policies CP3 of the Cannock Chase Local Plan (Part 1) 2014 and paragraphs 135 and 191 of the National Planning Policy Framework. 5. Insufficient information has been provided in respect of parking requirements, pedestrian access and servicing vehicle access. The potential increased activity at the site has the potential to have a detrimental impact upon highway safety and as such would not accord with paragraph 115 of the National Planning Policy Framework.
Related records

Understand this planning record

All planning guides

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

    UK research
    Published Updated

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

    UK research
    Published Updated

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.

    UK research
    Published Updated