Understanding planning · 13 min read
Planning application documents: what to read first
Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.
Application overview
Erection of a two storey side and rear extension and single storey front extension to create a porch
Proposal details
- Reference
- CH/24/029
- Alternative references
- PP-12757991
- Ward
- Hednesford North
- Parish
- Hednesford CP
- Agent
- Robert Kerr
- UPRN
- 100031623823
Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.
Sign in to view collected detailsDocuments 12 of 12
| Document | Published | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Refused 14.3.24 - Planning statementPREFDWG | Not published | View |
| Refused 14.3.24 - Proposed Ground Floor PlanPREFDWG | 30 Jan 2024 | View |
| Refused 14.3.24 - Proposed First Floor PlanPREFDWG | 30 Jan 2024 | View |
| Refused 14.3.24 - Existing Plans and ElevationsPREFDWG | 6 Feb 2024 | View |
| Refused 14.3.24 - Proposed Plans and ElevationsPREFDWG | 6 Feb 2024 | View |
| Application Form - without personal informationPAPPFRM | 6 Feb 2024 | View |
| Objection receivedPNEIGHCO | 16 Feb 2024 | View |
| Objection receivedPNEIGHCO | 28 Feb 2024 | View |
| Hednesford TC commentsPCONSULT | 5 Mar 2024 | View |
| Further objection receivedPNEIGHCO | 13 Mar 2024 | View |
| Officer ReportPOFFREP | 14 Mar 2024 | View |
| Decision NoticePDECNOT | 14 Mar 2024 | View |
Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.
Application timeline
Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.
Publicity end date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council sourceDecision due date
Past published deadlineA published target or deadline. It does not confirm an outcome.
Council source
Decision & conditions
Decision NoticePlanning conditions
- Reason for Refusal of Planning Permission In accordance with paragraph (38) of the National Planning Policy Framework the Local Planning Authority has worked with the applicant in a positive and proactive manner to approve the proposed development. However, in this instance the proposal fails to accord with the Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework. 1. The proposed two storey extension would be located immediately adjacent the rear boundary of No. 35 Greenwood Park, and would, extend for a width of approx. 8.5m. By reason of the scale and mass of the proposed first floor rear projection, the proposal would result in a visually intrusive and overbearing form of development detrimental to the amenities of No. 35 and their extended dwelling. It is therefore assessed that the proposal would not retain a high standard of amenity for the neighbouring occupier’s contrary to paragraph 135(f) of the National Planning Policy Framework and Local Plan Policy CP3.
