Council planning record

Proposed Work: T,1 cedar. T,2 maritime pine We propose a hard cut back of approximately 2.5-3 metres on both the Cedar and Maritime Pine trees to alleviate structural concerns, enhance property safety, and ensure long-term tree health. Justifications for Proposed Works: 1. Prevention of Property Damage: The Cedar tree’s branches are extending heavily over the property, while the Maritime Pine is located extremely close to the building. This proximity poses a substantial risk to the structure in the event of high winds or branch failure. Regular weather fluctuations and storms increase the likelihood of damage from overhanging branches or falling limbs, justifying the need for a precautionary cut back. 2. Improving Tree Health and Structural Integrity: Hard pruning will enhance the stability and health of both trees. Reducing the crown load by 2.5-3 metres can help balance the trees structurally, particularly for the Cedar, which shows excessive growth toward the property. Pruning can mitigate limb stress, thereby reducing the potential for breakage, which is essential for trees growing near inhabited structures. 3. Mitigation of Excessive Shading and Leaf Drop: The Cedar tree’s overextended canopy contributes to excessive shading, which can impact the living conditions within the property by reducing natural light. Additionally, both trees contribute significant leaf and needle drop onto the building, potentially clogging gutters and drainage systems, which may lead to water damage. 4. Public Safety: Given the height and structure of these trees, their proximity to the building creates potential safety hazards, particularly if branches fall or if the trees destabilise over time. This cut back would act as a preventative measure, minimizing risks to occupants and neighbouring properties. Conclusion: The proposed work will maintain the trees’ health while addressing structural and safety concerns. By carefully reducing the canopy, we aim to preserve the aesthetics and environmental contributions of the trees without compromising the integrity of the property. We believe this request aligns with local council guidelines on responsible tree management and would fulfil obligations to both safety and conservation.

THE LAKE, 52 Compton Avenue, POOLE, BH14 8PY

Application ApprovedReference: TP/24/00948/XBournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council

Last published check: 10 Oct 2026, 23:41. Check the council record for more recent changes.

Application timeline

Council milestones and published deadlines. A deadline passing does not confirm a decision.

  1. Application received

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  2. Application valid

    Published milestoneCouncil source
  3. Decision Date

    Published milestoneCouncil source

Application summary

Status
Application Approved
Application type
Tree work to tree/s subject to a TPO
Received
1 Nov 2024
Validated
1 Nov 2024
Determination deadline
Not published
Local authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council

Application overview

Proposed Work: T,1 cedar. T,2 maritime pine We propose a hard cut back of approximately 2.5-3 metres on both the Cedar and Maritime Pine trees to alleviate structural concerns, enhance property safety, and ensure long-term tree health. Justifications for Proposed Works: 1. Prevention of Property Damage: The Cedar tree’s branches are extending heavily over the property, while the Maritime Pine is located extremely close to the building. This proximity poses a substantial risk to the structure in the event of high winds or branch failure. Regular weather fluctuations and storms increase the likelihood of damage from overhanging branches or falling limbs, justifying the need for a precautionary cut back. 2. Improving Tree Health and Structural Integrity: Hard pruning will enhance the stability and health of both trees. Reducing the crown load by 2.5-3 metres can help balance the trees structurally, particularly for the Cedar, which shows excessive growth toward the property. Pruning can mitigate limb stress, thereby reducing the potential for breakage, which is essential for trees growing near inhabited structures. 3. Mitigation of Excessive Shading and Leaf Drop: The Cedar tree’s overextended canopy contributes to excessive shading, which can impact the living conditions within the property by reducing natural light. Additionally, both trees contribute significant leaf and needle drop onto the building, potentially clogging gutters and drainage systems, which may lead to water damage. 4. Public Safety: Given the height and structure of these trees, their proximity to the building creates potential safety hazards, particularly if branches fall or if the trees destabilise over time. This cut back would act as a preventative measure, minimizing risks to occupants and neighbouring properties. Conclusion: The proposed work will maintain the trees’ health while addressing structural and safety concerns. By carefully reducing the canopy, we aim to preserve the aesthetics and environmental contributions of the trees without compromising the integrity of the property. We believe this request aligns with local council guidelines on responsible tree management and would fulfil obligations to both safety and conservation.

Proposal details

Reference
TP/24/00948/X
Ward
Canford Cliffs
Agent
Mr R Saxon, Specialised Tree Service

Sign in to view all collected council fields and recorded changes.

Sign in to view collected details

Application location

THE LAKE, 52 Compton Avenue, POOLE, BH14 8PY

This record has no verified map location.

Documents 7 of 7

DocumentPublishedAction
CASE OFFICER REPORTReports/Statements31 Dec 2024View
AttachmentSummary135308770000.pdfOther1 Nov 2024View
2922437.pdfApplication Form1 Nov 2024View
TREE WORKSPhotograph1 Nov 2024View
TREE WORKSPhotograph1 Nov 2024View
APPROVEDDecision Notice31 Dec 2024View
TREE LOCATION PLANPlan1 Nov 2024View

Documents open on the council website. Browse council documents if a link has changed.

Decision & conditions

Granted
APPROVED
Planning conditions

Conditions aren’t listed here. Read the council decision notice for the full decision and conditions.

Related records

No related records were published in this section.

Understand this planning record

All planning guides
  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application documents: what to read first

    Understand planning application documents, officer reports and decision notices. Use a reading checklist, document table and worked example to inspect a case.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning application statuses explained

    Understand pending consideration, approved, refused and withdrawn planning applications. Compare status labels and find the documents explaining each outcome.

  • Understanding planning · 13 min read

    Planning permission drawings: how to read plans

    Read planning drawings, floor plans, elevations and sections. Use labelled diagrams, a drawing comparison table and revision checks to understand a proposal.